Well, Machado is only signed for one more year.go birds wrote:This is why i wanted to drain out pitching prospect pool for guys like yelich and machado. ozuna will be a decent bat here for 2 years then bone out.
Then we will be back at square one
Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)
-
dmarx114
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 25482
- Joined: December 20 07, 2:45 pm
Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch
- go birds
- -go birds
- Posts: 32057
- Joined: February 5 10, 9:54 am
Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch
dmarx114 wrote:Well, Machado is only signed for one more year.go birds wrote:This is why i wanted to drain out pitching prospect pool for guys like yelich and machado. ozuna will be a decent bat here for 2 years then bone out.
Then we will be back at square one
-
cardsfantx
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12218
- Joined: November 6 10, 10:58 am
Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch
oh good....WAR againMagneto2.0 wrote:Bad years? He's had 1 bad year out of 4.cardsfantx wrote:that's my line of thinking as well, which i hope is why the pieces we send aren't too great/over the top.Jocephus wrote:spm
12:28
In your opinion, was Ozuna's year a breakout or an anomaly?
Dave Cameron
12:28
More the latter.
12:29
I think he's a nice hitter, not a great one.
his bad years he's had are BAAAAD...and the good ones (up until 2017 obv) were basically piscotty
When did Piscotty have a 4.5 bWAR? Ozuna did that in his second year.
Ozuna has played 4 full seasons (First year he played 70 games)
He's hit 23 HRs at least every year, and has a WAR of 4.5, 0.4, 2.5, 5.8
Piscotty has had 2 full years, his best year he hit 22 HRs and had a WAR of 2.9.
Which would be Ozuna's 3rd best year, by a mile. So, I don't see how they're similar or really close.
edit:
we're not needing a WAR guy...we're needing a counting stats guy (HRs/OPS in particular..his WAR is higher cause he's a very good defender)
in 2014 his OPS was 772; in 2016 his OPS was 773 (in 2013 in 275 ABs his OPS was 692; in 2015 his OPS was 691)
even in his crappy year last year, piscotty's OPS was 709...in 2016 his OPS was 800
in other words, ozuna has NEVER had an OPS in ANY year higher than piscotty, other than last year (2017)
hope he's maturing/hitting his prime...or could just be an outlier
Last edited by cardsfantx on December 13 17, 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Big Amoco Sign
- Master of Hyperbole
- Posts: 14398
- Joined: December 1 17, 11:05 am
Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch
Ozuna is legit. Not as good as GRB makes him out to be. But he's an upgrade.
BABIP was .355 last year. That's coming down significantly to his norms soon. Walk rate isn't super impressive for a 3-4 hitter but I will take his good slugging.
He's going to be a ~119 wRC+ guy. We need more of those than not. Let's hope his LF defense improves a little too. Good guy for two years and ditch and get a real FA.
BABIP was .355 last year. That's coming down significantly to his norms soon. Walk rate isn't super impressive for a 3-4 hitter but I will take his good slugging.
He's going to be a ~119 wRC+ guy. We need more of those than not. Let's hope his LF defense improves a little too. Good guy for two years and ditch and get a real FA.
- misterManager
- Everyday Player
- Posts: 356
- Joined: June 6 17, 11:03 am
Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch
Yelich I can see after discussions in the Stanton thread.go birds wrote:This is why i wanted to drain out pitching prospect pool for guys like yelich and machado. ozuna will be a decent bat here for 2 years then bone out.
Then we will be back at square one
But why would you pay like 2x the price for Machado for half the control and the same profile of uncertainty? Both Machado and Donaldson are coming off the kind of near-disaster year we are prognosticating on with Ozuna's lost campaign a couple seasons back. In Donaldson's case it was probably 100% injury that kept him down, but Machdo was not a good hitter for the first half last year. Ozuna at least has two years to try to prove last year to not be a fluke. In a vacuum I see your point, but if the rumors of the O's asks from Philly are true, you could say goodbye to Reyes as well as everyone slated to go to Miami for Ozuna.
-
dmarx114
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 25482
- Joined: December 20 07, 2:45 pm
Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch
Seems like a good way to increase the chances of finishing 70-92 for the next decade.go birds wrote:dmarx114 wrote:Well, Machado is only signed for one more year.go birds wrote:This is why i wanted to drain out pitching prospect pool for guys like yelich and machado. ozuna will be a decent bat here for 2 years then bone out.
Then we will be back at square one
-
Magneto2.0
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 18100
- Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm
Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch
I'm not the biggest WAR guy, just using it as an example. But Piscotty isn't Ozuna's equal at all. Ozuna hits for more power and just is a better overall hitter period.cardsfantx wrote:oh good....WAR againMagneto2.0 wrote:Bad years? He's had 1 bad year out of 4.cardsfantx wrote:that's my line of thinking as well, which i hope is why the pieces we send aren't too great/over the top.Jocephus wrote:spm
12:28
In your opinion, was Ozuna's year a breakout or an anomaly?
Dave Cameron
12:28
More the latter.
12:29
I think he's a nice hitter, not a great one.
his bad years he's had are BAAAAD...and the good ones (up until 2017 obv) were basically piscotty
When did Piscotty have a 4.5 bWAR? Ozuna did that in his second year.
Ozuna has played 4 full seasons (First year he played 70 games)
He's hit 23 HRs at least every year, and has a WAR of 4.5, 0.4, 2.5, 5.8
Piscotty has had 2 full years, his best year he hit 22 HRs and had a WAR of 2.9.
Which would be Ozuna's 3rd best year, by a mile. So, I don't see how they're similar or really close.
He's not Stanton by any means, but as soon as we get him he's probably our best everyday player.
-
Fat Strat
- Official GRB Sponsor of Larry Bigbie
- Posts: 28010
- Joined: April 17 06, 9:16 pm
- Location: No. 16 on the Cards Top 15 Prospect List
Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch
I'm not even seeing a .4 for Ozuna at Fangraphs. In '15 he had his lowest PA total and still scrapped out a 1.2 fWAR (Fangraphs WAR) in just 494 PA's. That season Ozuna was shipped to AAA to keep him from getting the PA's he needed to get to arbitration on schedule. That move by Miami bought a year of his service time, which we now get (assuming a deal is done).
After his recall, he hit this in the rest of '15 -.278/.320/.469
This is '16 - .266/.321/.452
And we know '17 - .312/.376/.548
All in one of the worst offensive parks in the game. Conservative predictions for him say he'll hit .288/.352/.509 in '18 as a Marlin. Bump that up a little as a Cardinal.
Overall though I agree with Cameron in my now extensive analysis -- he's not a great hitter, like Donaldson or Stanton or Trout. He is, though, a very good hitter and is likely to remain so. Think more along the lines of Justin Upton or Ryan Zimmerman. Those guys are very comparable to him in his peaks and valleys.
After his recall, he hit this in the rest of '15 -.278/.320/.469
This is '16 - .266/.321/.452
And we know '17 - .312/.376/.548
All in one of the worst offensive parks in the game. Conservative predictions for him say he'll hit .288/.352/.509 in '18 as a Marlin. Bump that up a little as a Cardinal.
Overall though I agree with Cameron in my now extensive analysis -- he's not a great hitter, like Donaldson or Stanton or Trout. He is, though, a very good hitter and is likely to remain so. Think more along the lines of Justin Upton or Ryan Zimmerman. Those guys are very comparable to him in his peaks and valleys.
- go birds
- -go birds
- Posts: 32057
- Joined: February 5 10, 9:54 am
Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch
interestingdmarx114 wrote:Seems like a good way to increase the chances of finishing 70-92 for the next decade.go birds wrote:dmarx114 wrote:Well, Machado is only signed for one more year.go birds wrote:This is why i wanted to drain out pitching prospect pool for guys like yelich and machado. ozuna will be a decent bat here for 2 years then bone out.
Then we will be back at square one
-
cardsfantx
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12218
- Joined: November 6 10, 10:58 am
Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch
sorry, i added/edited the other post too late...Magneto2.0 wrote:I'm not the biggest WAR guy, just using it as an example. But Piscotty isn't Ozuna's equal at all. Ozuna hits for more power and just is a better overall hitter period.cardsfantx wrote:oh good....WAR againMagneto2.0 wrote:Bad years? He's had 1 bad year out of 4.cardsfantx wrote:that's my line of thinking as well, which i hope is why the pieces we send aren't too great/over the top.Jocephus wrote:spm
12:28
In your opinion, was Ozuna's year a breakout or an anomaly?
Dave Cameron
12:28
More the latter.
12:29
I think he's a nice hitter, not a great one.
his bad years he's had are BAAAAD...and the good ones (up until 2017 obv) were basically piscotty
When did Piscotty have a 4.5 bWAR? Ozuna did that in his second year.
Ozuna has played 4 full seasons (First year he played 70 games)
He's hit 23 HRs at least every year, and has a WAR of 4.5, 0.4, 2.5, 5.8
Piscotty has had 2 full years, his best year he hit 22 HRs and had a WAR of 2.9.
Which would be Ozuna's 3rd best year, by a mile. So, I don't see how they're similar or really close.
He's not Stanton by any means, but as soon as we get him he's probably our best everyday player.
we're not needing a WAR guy...we're needing a counting stats guy (HRs/OPS in particular..his WAR is higher cause he's a very good defender)
in 2014 his OPS was 772; in 2016 his OPS was 773 (in 2013 in 275 ABs his OPS was 692; in 2015 his OPS was 691)
even in his crappy year last year, piscotty's OPS was 709...in 2016 his OPS was 800
in other words, ozuna has NEVER had an OPS in ANY year higher than piscotty, other than last year (2017)
hope he's maturing/hitting his prime...or could just be an outlier

