movies

Chat about non-baseball topics. No political discussions!
User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30868
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Re: movies

Post by ghostrunner »


User avatar
mikechamp
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 11762
Joined: April 17 06, 5:05 pm
Location: Southwestern Illinois

Re: movies

Post by mikechamp »

The Matrix 4 trailer dropped yesterday. As a fan of the trilogy... I hope this movie is better than the vibe that the trailer gives me. (Though I am interested in seeing Harris' character.)

User avatar
Famous Mortimer
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 3961
Joined: November 14 14, 5:23 am
Location: Cherokee

Re: movies

Post by Famous Mortimer »

With the "Raiders" thing mentioned above, the fact that every single person watching that clip will be intimately familiar with the "original" helps a lot. No argument that Raiders is a great movie, but I wouldn't go all worshipful on Spielberg - remember he made "1941" just before that, and I don't see anyone talking about the masterful blocking and lighting there.

User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30868
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Re: movies

Post by ghostrunner »

Famous Mortimer wrote: ↑
September 10 21, 2:46 pm
With the "Raiders" thing mentioned above, the fact that every single person watching that clip will be intimately familiar with the "original" helps a lot. No argument that Raiders is a great movie, but I wouldn't go all worshipful on Spielberg - remember he made "1941" just before that, and I don't see anyone talking about the masterful blocking and lighting there.
Spielberg’s movies almost all look great, 1941 included. In a film class I took once we spent about half of one day talking about the scene in Jaws where the Sheriff addresses the town - specially about blocking. I presume nobody mentions 1941 because it’s kind of a mess for other reasons. At least that’s my recollection. But Spielberg knows what he’s doing visually, even when the rest of the movie doesn’t work.

User avatar
The Third Man
It rubs the lotion on its skin.
Posts: 8935
Joined: July 17 06, 1:00 pm

Re: movies

Post by The Third Man »

Yeah, say what you want about Spielberg emotionally, the man is a consummate formalist. In a perverse sense, he's become almost *underrated* because he laps the field so handily in terms of populist appeal and financial success that people miss the trees for the forest, as it were.

User avatar
The Third Man
It rubs the lotion on its skin.
Posts: 8935
Joined: July 17 06, 1:00 pm

Re: movies

Post by The Third Man »

I actually just revisited my favorite Spielberg - and very possibly my favorite film of all-time - the other day, and tweeted a bunch about it. If that interests anybody.

User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30868
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Re: movies

Post by ghostrunner »

The Third Man wrote: ↑
September 10 21, 10:59 pm
I actually just revisited my favorite Spielberg - and very possibly my favorite film of all-time - the other day, and tweeted a bunch about it. If that interests anybody.
Not my fave but close. Just rewatched it. One of his best. Also looks amazing.

Jocephus
99% conan clips
Posts: 64992
Joined: April 18 06, 5:14 pm

Re: movies

Post by Jocephus »


User avatar
CardsofSTL
All Hail the GDT Master
Posts: 70079
Joined: April 26 11, 6:06 am
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: movies

Post by CardsofSTL »

I watched Cry Macho on HBO Max over the weekend. Eastwood is too old really for the part; but it was kind of nice seeing him in a western again anyway. Small story but pleasant watch.

Dwight Yoakam is not a strong actor.

User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30868
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Re: movies

Post by ghostrunner »

Hell yeah.


Post Reply