Carpenter Signed through 2011, op. 2012 (Matthew Leach)

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball
Post Reply
User avatar
Jmodene
Still waiting for someone to use a Weird Al song
Posts: 15528
Joined: April 18 06, 5:54 pm
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Post by Jmodene »

Still digesting it, too. My first impulse, though, is "guarded excitement".

Basically, I like the deal but do worry about giving a 5-year deal to virtually any pitcher. But as mentioned numerous times in this thread, if any pitcher deserves it, it's Carpenter.

Magneto
Veteran Player
Posts: 984
Joined: April 20 06, 5:39 pm

Post by Magneto »

Michael wrote:
Magneto wrote:How someone can dislike this is completely mind boggling. Wow.

Great for Carpenter and the Cards.
I'm not sure if I like or dislike the extension, to be honest I'm still digesting it. I guess it all depends on the savings they received by getting it done a year earlier. It's certainly interesting.
If Chris Carpenter was on the market, do you realize how much he'd be getting in? This is a huge bargain. 5 years might be the only draw back, and even then, he'll just be 36 at the end of the contract, and even if he had a bad last year, him being good for the next 4 alone is worth it. Unless Carpenter doesn't pitch the last 3 years of the contract, I don't see how this is a bad deal at all. He's the best pitcher in the NL.

I mean Kevin Millwood signed for 6/60 for god's sake. LOL.

User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30813
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Post by ghostrunner »

It tells fans and other players that the organization is serious about continuing to win in the near future. There has to be some value in that. There appears to have been in Rolen's case.

Sure he could get injured this year. He could also get injured the next year, assuming we waited for this season to be over before signing him. The market could settle, it could continue moving skyward, especially if the Yankees continue to overpay for crap.

For all we know, Carpenter was asking to do something now, and had a number and years in mind. Maybe they went back and forth on it, and arrived at this number. He's a great guy by most accounts, and a Cy Young winner.

In this case, I don't mind picking safe over sorry.

User avatar
ToughGuy_BlueShirt
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 4211
Joined: May 19 06, 3:30 pm

Post by ToughGuy_BlueShirt »

Magneto wrote:
Michael wrote:
Magneto wrote:How someone can dislike this is completely mind boggling. Wow.

Great for Carpenter and the Cards.
I'm not sure if I like or dislike the extension, to be honest I'm still digesting it. I guess it all depends on the savings they received by getting it done a year earlier. It's certainly interesting.
If Chris Carpenter was on the market, do you realize how much he'd be getting in? This is a huge bargain. 5 years might be the only draw back, and even then, he'll just be 36 at the end of the contract, and even if he had a bad last year, him being good for the next 4 alone is worth it. Unless Carpenter doesn't pitch the last 3 years of the contract, I don't see how this is a bad deal at all. He's the best pitcher in the NL.

I mean Kevin Millwood signed for 6/60 for god's sake. LOL.
Won't he be 38 at the end of his contract?

Michael
GRB Founder
Posts: 35303
Joined: December 31 69, 6:00 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Post by Michael »

Magneto wrote:
Michael wrote:
Magneto wrote:How someone can dislike this is completely mind boggling. Wow.

Great for Carpenter and the Cards.
I'm not sure if I like or dislike the extension, to be honest I'm still digesting it. I guess it all depends on the savings they received by getting it done a year earlier. It's certainly interesting.
If Chris Carpenter was on the market, do you realize how much he'd be getting in? This is a huge bargain. 5 years might be the only draw back, and even then, he'll just be 36 at the end of the contract, and even if he had a bad last year, him being good for the next 4 alone is worth it. Unless Carpenter doesn't pitch the last 3 years of the contract, I don't see how this is a bad deal at all. He's the best pitcher in the NL.

I mean Kevin Millwood signed for 6/60 for god's sake. LOL.

Yeah, but we already had him locked up for 2 years. Millwood was a FA when he signed his contract. A lot can happen to a pitcher in 2 years - good or bad.

Magneto
Veteran Player
Posts: 984
Joined: April 20 06, 5:39 pm

Post by Magneto »

ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:
Magneto wrote:
Michael wrote:
Magneto wrote:How someone can dislike this is completely mind boggling. Wow.

Great for Carpenter and the Cards.
I'm not sure if I like or dislike the extension, to be honest I'm still digesting it. I guess it all depends on the savings they received by getting it done a year earlier. It's certainly interesting.
If Chris Carpenter was on the market, do you realize how much he'd be getting in? This is a huge bargain. 5 years might be the only draw back, and even then, he'll just be 36 at the end of the contract, and even if he had a bad last year, him being good for the next 4 alone is worth it. Unless Carpenter doesn't pitch the last 3 years of the contract, I don't see how this is a bad deal at all. He's the best pitcher in the NL.

I mean Kevin Millwood signed for 6/60 for god's sake. LOL.
Won't he be 38 at the end of his contract?
He'll be 36.

User avatar
Secret Weapon
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 8386
Joined: May 12 06, 7:09 pm
Location: CoMo

Post by Secret Weapon »

Magneto wrote:
Michael wrote:
Magneto wrote:How someone can dislike this is completely mind boggling. Wow.

Great for Carpenter and the Cards.
I'm not sure if I like or dislike the extension, to be honest I'm still digesting it. I guess it all depends on the savings they received by getting it done a year earlier. It's certainly interesting.
If Chris Carpenter was on the market, do you realize how much he'd be getting in? This is a huge bargain. 5 years might be the only draw back, and even then, he'll just be 36 at the end of the contract, and even if he had a bad last year, him being good for the next 4 alone is worth it. Unless Carpenter doesn't pitch the last 3 years of the contract, I don't see how this is a bad deal at all. He's the best pitcher in the NL.

I mean Kevin Millwood signed for 6/60 for god's sake. LOL.
Yeah but it's a much different scenario, Carpenter wasn't a FA, he still had 2 years/15 million left on his current deal. Basically they tacked on 50 million for 3 years after that, which will be a little over 16 million per year once his current contract is over. I don't think it's a bad contract, but I also don't think the Cardinals are getting some huge bargain for the amount of risk they are taking on at the moment.

Magneto
Veteran Player
Posts: 984
Joined: April 20 06, 5:39 pm

Post by Magneto »

Michael wrote:
Magneto wrote:
Michael wrote:
Magneto wrote:How someone can dislike this is completely mind boggling. Wow.

Great for Carpenter and the Cards.
I'm not sure if I like or dislike the extension, to be honest I'm still digesting it. I guess it all depends on the savings they received by getting it done a year earlier. It's certainly interesting.
If Chris Carpenter was on the market, do you realize how much he'd be getting in? This is a huge bargain. 5 years might be the only draw back, and even then, he'll just be 36 at the end of the contract, and even if he had a bad last year, him being good for the next 4 alone is worth it. Unless Carpenter doesn't pitch the last 3 years of the contract, I don't see how this is a bad deal at all. He's the best pitcher in the NL.

I mean Kevin Millwood signed for 6/60 for god's sake. LOL.

Yeah, but we already had him locked up for 2 years. Millwood was a FA when he signed his contract. A lot can happen to a pitcher in 2 years - good or bad.
It's better to have him locked up then not to. That's how I feel about it. Carpenter is worth more then 13 million a season. Zito will make more then him, and Zito isn't even on the same planet as Chris pitching wise.

Magneto
Veteran Player
Posts: 984
Joined: April 20 06, 5:39 pm

Post by Magneto »

whyhellothere wrote:
Magneto wrote:
Michael wrote:
Magneto wrote:How someone can dislike this is completely mind boggling. Wow.

Great for Carpenter and the Cards.
I'm not sure if I like or dislike the extension, to be honest I'm still digesting it. I guess it all depends on the savings they received by getting it done a year earlier. It's certainly interesting.
If Chris Carpenter was on the market, do you realize how much he'd be getting in? This is a huge bargain. 5 years might be the only draw back, and even then, he'll just be 36 at the end of the contract, and even if he had a bad last year, him being good for the next 4 alone is worth it. Unless Carpenter doesn't pitch the last 3 years of the contract, I don't see how this is a bad deal at all. He's the best pitcher in the NL.

I mean Kevin Millwood signed for 6/60 for god's sake. LOL.
Yeah but it's a much different scenario, Carpenter wasn't a FA, he still had 2 years/15 million left on his current deal. Basically they tacked on 50 million for 3 years after that, which will be a little over 16 million per year once his current contract is over. I don't think it's a bad contract, but I also don't think the Cardinals are getting some huge bargain for the amount of risk they are taking on at the moment.
In a market were Lilly and Suppan will make close to 10 a year, 16 might not be a bargain per se, but it's still a very good contract.

Michael
GRB Founder
Posts: 35303
Joined: December 31 69, 6:00 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Post by Michael »

Magneto wrote:It's better to have him locked up then not to. That's how I feel about it. Carpenter is worth more then 13 million a season. Zito will make more then him, and Zito isn't even on the same planet as Chris pitching wise.
I agree, he's better than Zito. But you are comparing a FA contract to an extension for a player who had 2 years left on his deal. I don't hate this deal but I wouldn't call it a no brainier. I'm just curious how much more the contract would have cost if they had waited a year. Like I said, it's a very interesting extension.
Last edited by Michael on December 4 06, 8:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply