Interestingly, most of the giant insurance companies are choosing not to compete on the exchanges Obamacare is creating. So yeah, "insurance companies" are still getting money, but they are smaller, startup-types that are really trying to compete in the exchanges. I read that Cigna, UnitedHealth, Aetna, etc, all chose not to offer anything on the exchanges (in Califonria at least - I assume they'd make the same decision elsewhere). I think it shows 2 things: 1) It shows these insurance companies are unwilling to innovate and would rather sit back and defend their employer-based insurance turf. We'll see how that works out - it could be a tragic mistake for them in the long run and 2) It's more circumstantial evidence that shows that Obamacare may actually be a pretty big break from what we've had in the past.AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:But, hey, at least insurance companies are still getting their money.
I agree that Obamacare is not a cure-all, and just a first step. I'm sure you can find problems of waste in single-payer systems, too. There is no "perfect" system...but almost anything is better (cheaper, with better outcomes) than what we have in the USA.


