Page 15 of 18
Re: Hochman
Posted: March 6 18, 11:58 am
by Jocephus
their wedding got a nyt writeup too. i think it was posted here somewhere
Re: Hochman
Posted: March 14 18, 12:22 pm
by Jocephus
it wasn't me
Before we get started, let me please point out that I will not acknowledge any questions that take shots at any of my colleagues. Out of habit I tend to hit the next question in the queue and I almost got suckered into clicking one that included an insulting comment. I don't find those questions credible or funny. Thanks for understanding.
by jortiz 1:03 PM
Re: Hochman
Posted: March 14 18, 12:35 pm
by MrCrowesGarden
It could've been about Hochman, but I wonder if someone asked about something being in the paper as a shot at Goold.
Re: Hochman
Posted: March 14 18, 1:54 pm
by Swirls
MrCrowesGarden wrote:It could've been about Hochman, but I wonder if someone asked about something being in the paper as a shot at Goold.
Looks like Hummel has recently been getting some shots taken at him as well.
Re: Hochman
Posted: March 16 18, 7:41 pm
by MrCrowesGarden
Re: Hochman
Posted: March 16 18, 7:53 pm
by Joe Shlabotnik
MrCrowesGarden wrote:
If you want to get punched "Ned Ryerson! Bing! Bing Again!"
Re: Hochman
Posted: March 16 18, 9:25 pm
by Jocephus
the dude is not funny.
Re: Hochman
Posted: March 19 18, 10:55 am
by sighyoung
Jocephus wrote:the dude is not funny.
In sit-com parlance, he would be "zany" or "wacky."
He may be angling for the part of Balki in a remake of "Perfect Strangers."
Re: Hochman
Posted: March 19 18, 12:13 pm
by ZigZagCardsFan
There are few things more intolerable, than an unfunny person who thinks they're [expletive] hilarious.
Re: Hochman
Posted: March 21 18, 5:23 pm
by Radbird
ZigZagCardsFan wrote:There are few things more intolerable, than an unfunny person who thinks they're [expletive] hilarious.
++