Update: HOLLIDAY A CARD 7yr/120 million, p178

Classic threads for your viewing pleasure.
Locked
greenback44
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 11665
Joined: June 26 06, 8:54 pm
Location: In a Small Town with Jack and Diane

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by greenback44 »

PujolJunkie wrote:How [expletive] close to a deal can you get 7 or 8 times without signing someone?
I'd guess the leak that they're close is equivalent to this:
Image
So the question is when will the Cardinals say "Take it or leave it"?

User avatar
clevername
Bringer of FRBG
Posts: 10380
Joined: April 16 06, 7:13 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by clevername »

Richie Allen wrote:
clevername wrote:again, no one is saying we should lowball him with a $14 million/year offer. We're saying we shouldn't be paying $20 million a year when we can get him for $17-18 million a year.

And if he's going to be a [expletive] because he's only making $17-18 million a year he can get lost.
If you're telling me that we can get him for $17-$18 million a year, I'd be an idiot to say we should give him $20. I just don't know how you would know that.

And I'm also considering that a couple million dollars a year savings will afford us what, a slightly better reserve player or middle reliever? I wouldn't let that come between signing Holliday or not, regardless of whether it appears to be a good deal or not. From where I'm at, not signing Holliday at this point couldn't possibly be considered a good deal for us, at least in the short term. I'll take may chances with him as a Cardinal, even if he is considered overpaid by some.
that number comes from virtually every rumored offer we've seen the last 2-3 weeks. None have approached $20 million a year.

the extra $2-3 million a year could be used for any number of things from increased draft pick money to padding Albert's new deal.

User avatar
clevername
Bringer of FRBG
Posts: 10380
Joined: April 16 06, 7:13 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by clevername »

fwiw, Olney's reporting it's likely a 7 year deal.

Michael
GRB Founder
Posts: 35303
Joined: December 31 69, 6:00 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by Michael »

I hope that Beltre deal is true. That'd help negotiations.

jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by jim »

clevername wrote:
Richie Allen wrote:
clevername wrote:again, no one is saying we should lowball him with a $14 million/year offer. We're saying we shouldn't be paying $20 million a year when we can get him for $17-18 million a year.

And if he's going to be a [expletive] because he's only making $17-18 million a year he can get lost.
If you're telling me that we can get him for $17-$18 million a year, I'd be an idiot to say we should give him $20. I just don't know how you would know that.

And I'm also considering that a couple million dollars a year savings will afford us what, a slightly better reserve player or middle reliever? I wouldn't let that come between signing Holliday or not, regardless of whether it appears to be a good deal or not. From where I'm at, not signing Holliday at this point couldn't possibly be considered a good deal for us, at least in the short term. I'll take may chances with him as a Cardinal, even if he is considered overpaid by some.
that number comes from virtually every rumored offer we've seen the last 2-3 weeks. None have approached $20 million a year.

the extra $2-3 million a year could be used for any number of things from increased draft pick money to padding Albert's new deal.
Chump change. They can find that in the sofa. What you offer gazillion million bazillion, what's a couple of million?

User avatar
haltz
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 22630
Joined: November 9 06, 6:45 am
Location: a proud midwestern metropolis

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by haltz »

Hopefully the deal is pretty much done, or else the Cards shouldn't have let Beltre go to the Red Sox that cheaply. Not seeing a whole lot of smart plan Bs out there with Byrd, Johnson, Cameron and now Beltre off the table.

Either way, I hope we sign Ben Sheets.

User avatar
Swingingbunt
All-Star
Posts: 2904
Joined: April 4 08, 9:49 am
Location: Indianapolis

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by Swingingbunt »

haltz wrote:Hopefully the deal is pretty much done, or else the Cards shouldn't have let Beltre go to the Red Sox that cheaply. Not seeing a whole lot of smart plan Bs out there with Byrd, Johnson, Cameron and now Beltre off the table.

Either way, I hope we sign Ben Sheets.
I'm with you...Mo must have one helluva poker face.

User avatar
Richie Allen
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 7458
Joined: December 22 06, 1:06 am

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by Richie Allen »

clevername wrote:that number comes from virtually every rumored offer we've seen the last 2-3 weeks. None have approached $20 million a year.
What we've been rumored to offer (which the validity has not been confirmed) and what he's asking are likely two very different things. And it's probably safe to say that the rumors are based on what we've been thought to have offered.
clevername wrote: the extra $2-3 million a year could be used for any number of things from increased draft pick money to padding Albert's new deal.
And you might just end up with an extra $19-20 million to spend.

User avatar
Swingingbunt
All-Star
Posts: 2904
Joined: April 4 08, 9:49 am
Location: Indianapolis

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by Swingingbunt »

...oh Strauss...

User avatar
Richie Allen
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 7458
Joined: December 22 06, 1:06 am

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by Richie Allen »

Swingingbunt wrote:...oh Strauss...
"Might be worthwhile to stay up late Re: latest Holliday developments. To appear soon @STLtoday.com. Or buy Tuesday's paper. Either one fine."

Locked