Carpenter Signed through 2011, op. 2012 (Matthew Leach)

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball
Socnorb11
The Last Word
Posts: 21906
Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am

Post by Socnorb11 »

It's silly to say it's a "3 year deal at $50 mil", as Sheehan tries to imply.

The Cards are getting him for less than $13 mil per year average because they're extending him. 2 years from now, I seriously doubt if he would have signed a 3-year contract for $13 mil.

The old contract is shredded. This is a 5-year contract, for less than $13 mil per year average. That's what it is. I'm not sure why people insist on making it something else.

And yes, there's some risk. That's not a revalation.

Magneto
Veteran Player
Posts: 984
Joined: April 20 06, 5:39 pm

Post by Magneto »

"A nice deal was put together by Walt Jocketty and the Cardinals to lock up Chris Carpenter at below-market rates. They'll fill out their roster card with similar deals. Somehow, St Louis seems to get more for less than any other team."

Will Carrol

User avatar
HugeCardfan
Veteran Player
Posts: 745
Joined: July 25 06, 1:59 pm

Post by HugeCardfan »

ghostrunner wrote:
Fat Strat wrote:Our well documented reluctance to pass out 5 year deals just died a quick death.
I don't think so. As long as we don't make it a habit. It's pretty clear to most that there's a good relationship established there and we wouldn't go long on Burnett. We'll see what happens with Schmidt though.
Good point. I'll go one further and say that the real message is that just because a player gives us a home town discount, doesn't mean that at some point in our relationship we won't reward him for his allegiance and superior performance. Because we give Carp a three year extension to a sweet 2 year deal doesn't obligate us to consider a five year extravaganza for a free agent. Why would it?

User avatar
Secret Weapon
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 8386
Joined: May 12 06, 7:09 pm
Location: CoMo

Re: Carpenter Signed through 2011, op. 2012 (Matthew Leach)

Post by Secret Weapon »

Well I read this on rotowire...
Chris Carpenter (P) STL 9/20/2008
Carpenter (shoulder) had an MRI on Friday, and is awaiting a radiologist's reading on the results, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports.

The weakness and nerve irritation in Carpenter's shoulders are starting to sound a bit more serious than originally thought. Carpenter is already done for the season, but it would not be surprising if he needed surgery on his shoulder, putting the start of his 2009 in doubt.
...and I was bored so I thought I'd give this thread another read. Not one of the times I'm happy to have been right. The 43.5 million we owe him over the next 3 years makes me a little uneasy.

User avatar
Jmodene
Still waiting for someone to use a Weird Al song
Posts: 15528
Joined: April 18 06, 5:54 pm
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Re: Carpenter Signed through 2011, op. 2012 (Matthew Leach)

Post by Jmodene »

Well, it's not like Carpenter hadn't already earned the money, when he gave us those 3 good seasons at a cut-rate price. Still, it's a shame.

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37260
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: Carpenter Signed through 2011, op. 2012 (Matthew Leach)

Post by lukethedrifter »

this is what I was looking for.

Thoughts on the Carpenter contract in hindsight? Obviously it has worked out well but was it not a great move that relied to much on good fortune?

Fat Strat
Official GRB Sponsor of Larry Bigbie
Posts: 28010
Joined: April 17 06, 9:16 pm
Location: No. 16 on the Cards Top 15 Prospect List

Re: Carpenter Signed through 2011, op. 2012 (Matthew Leach)

Post by Fat Strat »

Well, he's lived up to his contract but that still doesn't make it a good deal at all.

The old contract had an extension for '08. He basically missed all of '07 and '08. IF we had waited to do the extension like many of us thought, we would have been negotiating with a player who had just missed the previous two seasons. You think he would have gotten anything close to $14-$15 million that he's making now from '09-'12? Not a chance.

He would have been looking at something closer to $10 million per year, but for less time. By now he would be making big bucks again, but we definitely cost ourselves $10+ million in that extension.

And,again, Carp has definitely earned every cent we've paid him. We just should have would have been paying him less if we hadn't done the extension when we did.

User avatar
Secret Weapon
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 8386
Joined: May 12 06, 7:09 pm
Location: CoMo

Re: Carpenter Signed through 2011, op. 2012 (Matthew Leach)

Post by Secret Weapon »

i like how people assumed we would have at least a 115 million dollar payroll by now

Socnorb11
The Last Word
Posts: 21906
Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am

Re: Carpenter Signed through 2011, op. 2012 (Matthew Leach)

Post by Socnorb11 »

Fat Strat wrote:Well, he's lived up to his contract but that still doesn't make it a good deal at all.

The old contract had an extension for '08. He basically missed all of '07 and '08. IF we had waited to do the extension like many of us thought, we would have been negotiating with a player who had just missed the previous two seasons. You think he would have gotten anything close to $14-$15 million that he's making now from '09-'12? Not a chance.

He would have been looking at something closer to $10 million per year, but for less time. By now he would be making big bucks again, but we definitely cost ourselves $10+ million in that extension.

And,again, Carp has definitely earned every cent we've paid him. We just should have would have been paying him less if we hadn't done the extension when we did.
Not to re-hash this, but you can't negotiate a contract under the assumption that a player is going to be injured. So the only other option was to wait until Carpenter became a free agent. Let's assume they did that. Sabathia got $23 mil per year. Halladay got $20 mil per year. You have to assume that Carpenter would have been in that range also, if he had been "healthy Chris" in '07 and '08. As it is, the Cardinals gambled by signing him early for a presumed "discount". It turned out about right.

User avatar
Secret Weapon
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 8386
Joined: May 12 06, 7:09 pm
Location: CoMo

Re: Carpenter Signed through 2011, op. 2012 (Matthew Leach)

Post by Secret Weapon »

Socnorb11 wrote:
Fat Strat wrote:Well, he's lived up to his contract but that still doesn't make it a good deal at all.

The old contract had an extension for '08. He basically missed all of '07 and '08. IF we had waited to do the extension like many of us thought, we would have been negotiating with a player who had just missed the previous two seasons. You think he would have gotten anything close to $14-$15 million that he's making now from '09-'12? Not a chance.

He would have been looking at something closer to $10 million per year, but for less time. By now he would be making big bucks again, but we definitely cost ourselves $10+ million in that extension.

And,again, Carp has definitely earned every cent we've paid him. We just should have would have been paying him less if we hadn't done the extension when we did.
Not to re-hash this, but you can't negotiate a contract under the assumption that a player is going to be injured. So the only other option was to wait until Carpenter became a free agent. Let's assume they did that. Sabathia got $23 mil per year. Halladay got $20 mil per year. You have to assume that Carpenter would have been in that range also, if he had been "healthy Chris" in '07 and '08. As it is, the Cardinals gambled by signing him early for a presumed "discount". It turned out about right.
But the Cardinals signed him to an extension 2 full years before he hit free agency, which is really rare for pitchers who aren't arb eligible. So they could have easily waited another year before locking him up.

Post Reply