NCAA Tournament Thread
- Swingingbunt
- All-Star
- Posts: 2904
- Joined: April 4 08, 9:49 am
- Location: Indianapolis
Re: NCAA Tournament Thread
Ohio St. as the #1 overall definitely got shafted in terms of the other top groups in their bracket. I would MUCH rather have Florida, BYU, Wisconsin and K State as the next four than any of the other brackets. I could see any of Ohio St., Kentucky, UNC, or Syracuse (my personal darkhorse...if you can call a 3 seed that) coming out of the East...Kansas, Notre Dame, Purdue, or Louisville coming out of the Southwest...Duke, Texas, or UCONN (if they stay hot) out of the West...out of the Southeast, I almost feel like if Pitt doesn't get out that they've been way over rated.
-
AWvsCBsteeeerike3
- "I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
- Posts: 27557
- Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
- Location: Thinking of the Children
Re: NCAA Tournament Thread
Yeah, I certainly don't feel like there's a discernable difference b/w the 2-11 teams in the SE Bracket. Would anyone really be surprised to see MI State (10) get hot or Zaga (11) make it to the Final 4? NOt so much because they're that good, but because no one else is other than Pitt.
-
Faceman
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 4800
- Joined: May 23 06, 11:56 am
- Location: Memphis, TN
Re: NCAA Tournament Thread
I agree that Florida got BYU's 2 seed, but I think it's because they truly are not a 2 seed without Davies.
As for the seeds, I think the committee allows itself the right to move teams a line or two up or down, for matchups and such. There is no way Mizzou was one of the last 6 teams in the tourney.
The Big 10 is the number 1 conference (Pomeroy) and got a bunch of 8-11 seeds. I think they were fairly seeded.
The Big 12, I think K-State was overseeded, Texas and Mizzou underseeded. I agree they were slighted moderately.
As for the seeds, I think the committee allows itself the right to move teams a line or two up or down, for matchups and such. There is no way Mizzou was one of the last 6 teams in the tourney.
The Big 10 is the number 1 conference (Pomeroy) and got a bunch of 8-11 seeds. I think they were fairly seeded.
The Big 12, I think K-State was overseeded, Texas and Mizzou underseeded. I agree they were slighted moderately.
- cardsfansince82
- is shooing asian children away from his fridge.
- Posts: 27776
- Joined: May 17 06, 10:23 pm
- Location: at the gettin' place
Re: NCAA Tournament Thread
Any rating system that concludes this is inherently flawed and not worth mentioning.Faceman wrote: The Big 10 is the number 1 conference (Pomeroy)
-
bschulte
- Everyday Player
- Posts: 319
- Joined: April 20 06, 2:10 pm
- Location: SW Illinois
- Contact:
Re: NCAA Tournament Thread
I, on the other hand, am very familiar with KenPom and Sagarin's rating systems. I think they currently do the best job of judging a team's true talent. At worst, the Big Ten was second behind the Big East. I'm not sure who else you could put up there this year. If you're thinking Big 12, you've got a bias.cardsfansince82 wrote:Any rating system that concludes this is inherently flawed and not worth mentioning.Faceman wrote: The Big 10 is the number 1 conference (Pomeroy)
A lot of you will probably be interested in this article from Nate Silver (former(?) Baseball Prospectus guy) at the New York Times which tries to see who got an easy or tough draw:
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.co ... -is-vital/
-
Faceman
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 4800
- Joined: May 23 06, 11:56 am
- Location: Memphis, TN
Re: NCAA Tournament Thread
Let the big ten hate begin. 
-
greenback44
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 11664
- Joined: June 26 06, 8:54 pm
- Location: In a Small Town with Jack and Diane
Re: NCAA Tournament Thread
They earned it. The Big Ten has the best team in the country and two other pretty good teams. But there's a lot of junk after that. I've never understood why selection committees feel like the Michigan States -- big-time programs having mediocre seasons -- need to be represented over the small schools. If I were a Southwest Missouri State fan, I'd be posting all kinds of Gene Smith conspiracies right now.Faceman wrote:Let the big ten hate begin.
Go Blue!
-
Michael
- GRB Founder
- Posts: 35303
- Joined: December 31 69, 6:00 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: NCAA Tournament Thread
greenback44 wrote:They earned it. The Big Ten has the best team in the country and two other pretty good teams. But there's a lot of junk after that. I've never understood why selection committees feel like the Michigan States -- big-time programs having mediocre seasons -- need to be represented over the small schools. If I were a Southwest Missouri State fan, I'd be posting all kinds of Gene Smith conspiracies right now.Faceman wrote:Let the big ten hate begin.
Go Blue!
My guess is TV ratings.
-
Socnorb11
- The Last Word
- Posts: 21906
- Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am
Re: NCAA Tournament Thread
I think that's true of every other conference, and for almost all of them it's true to an even larger degree.greenback44 wrote:They earned it. The Big Ten has the best team in the country and two other pretty good teams. But there's a lot of junk after that.Faceman wrote:Let the big ten hate begin.
-
AWvsCBsteeeerike3
- "I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
- Posts: 27557
- Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
- Location: Thinking of the Children
Re: NCAA Tournament Thread
Jim Delaney is a [expletive] (rhymes with suck) wad.greenback44 wrote:They earned it. The Big Ten has the best team in the country and two other pretty good teams. But there's a lot of junk after that. I've never understood why selection committees feel like the Michigan States -- big-time programs having mediocre seasons -- need to be represented over the small schools. If I were a Southwest Missouri State fan, I'd be posting all kinds of Gene Smith conspiracies right now.Faceman wrote:Let the big ten hate begin.
Go Blue!
How's that Face?

