Posted: March 27 07, 11:12 am
I think Edmonds will have a great year. He has alway been one of the most under rated players in baseball.
Can't wait for opening day!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Can't wait for opening day!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
https://gatewayredbirds.org/forum/
Mental midget.Transmogrified Tiger wrote:I don't know if he'll fall to Encarnacion levels, but the trend of the last few years, age, and wear & tear aren't working in Edmonds' favor. I'd be surprised if he bounced back, but then I'm a Cubs fan so I'm supposed to go retarded about now.
Nah, you're just supposed to make a gay joke about Edmonds and run away.Transmogrified Tiger wrote:I'd be surprised if he bounced back, but then I'm a Cubs fan so I'm supposed to go retarded about now.
But the stats ain't lying. Yes, Edmonds has fallen from his apex of 2004. The point is, that despite his fall from grace, he's still among the best center fielders in baseball. To say that 2005 was "not good" is an outright lie.TimeForGuinness wrote:I know his stats say one thing and that's fine, but he has been declining the past two years while battling injuries and getting older.
That's just silly to say. Alfonso Soriano, Aramis Ramirez, Jacque Jones, Mark DeRosa and Cesar Izturis are notorious for being base cloggers. I wouldn't be surprised to see those guys all near a .400 OBP.Mephistopheles wrote:The Cubs won't lead the division in OBP. It's not humanly possible.
Ok, I'll clarify 2005, not "as" good. Not "as" good at 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000...since he became a cardinal.GatewaySnayke wrote:But the stats ain't lying. Yes, Edmonds has fallen from his apex of 2004. The point is, that despite his fall from grace, he's still among the best center fielders in baseball. To say that 2005 was "not good" is an outright lie.TimeForGuinness wrote:I know his stats say one thing and that's fine, but he has been declining the past two years while battling injuries and getting older.
I am sure that Edmonds is going to be protected by La Russa. I would be very surprised if he starts much against lefties this season.
Yeah, but if he lost a step, it's a step nobody else really had in the first place.TimeForGuinness wrote:Ok, I'll clarify 2005, not "as" good. Not "as" good at 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000...since he became a cardinal.GatewaySnayke wrote:But the stats ain't lying. Yes, Edmonds has fallen from his apex of 2004. The point is, that despite his fall from grace, he's still among the best center fielders in baseball. To say that 2005 was "not good" is an outright lie.TimeForGuinness wrote:I know his stats say one thing and that's fine, but he has been declining the past two years while battling injuries and getting older.
I am sure that Edmonds is going to be protected by La Russa. I would be very surprised if he starts much against lefties this season.