Rich Hill vs Adam Wainwright part 2

[Dillagii]

Hill's is pretty impressive.

Hill's certainly cannot be right. He would have a 0.21 ERA if that were the case.



--P--

I think thats their batting stats.

[lukethedrifter]

Hill's is pretty impressive.

Hill's certainly cannot be right. He would have a 0.21 ERA if that were the case.



--P--

I think thats their batting stats.

i think you must be right

[The Third Man]

Ah.

Well in that case, for final clarification:

Wainwright OPS: .271/.314/.396/.710, 86 OPS+
OPS against: .276/.340/.392/.728

Hill OPS: .140/.157/.180/.337, -14 OPS+
OPS against: .233/.302/.393/.691

[Transmogrified Tiger]

Hill

[GatewaySnayke]

Wainwright. Plus, he's been better this season.

[Magneto2.0]

Adam Wainwright has always been better.

[GatewaySnayke]

Wainwright. Plus, he's been better this season.

I'm surprised a Cubs fan hasn't been around to argue this yet.

[Jocephus]

wagonmakers go over hills

[Asmodai]

Ok. It's pretty much impossible for me not to vote Wainwright, just because of my opinion of him after having watched him pitch for two years now. He's been impressive to say the least.

From an objective standpoint, Hill, though, is probably the better pick. Either way I think you're going to get a quality #2 starter.

Why bother using that when you can post xFIP which tells you more. 4.54 for Wainwright and 4.02 for Hill.

[Asmodai]

Wainwright. Plus, he's been better this season.

I'm surprised a Cubs fan hasn't been around to argue this yet.

Because I don't like arguing with a brick wall.