Page 3 of 3
Re: Fantasy Football - Start em, sit em
Posted: November 26 08, 9:55 am
by planet planet
Which 2 of 3 receivers would you start? Don't laugh at my crappy options; I'm seriously weak at WR. They're all playing pretty crappy pass defenses.
Holt v. Dolphins
Gage v. Lions
Berrian v. Bears
Re: Fantasy Football - Start em, sit em
Posted: November 26 08, 9:56 am
by Jocephus
planet pujolsian wrote:Which 2 of 3 receivers would you start? Don't laugh at my crappy options; I'm seriously weak at WR. They're all playing pretty crappy pass defenses.
Holt v. Dolphins
Gage v. Lions
Berrian v. Bears
id prolly go holt and gage
but i've yet to put together a good FF season...
Re: Fantasy Football - Start em, sit em
Posted: November 26 08, 11:08 am
by letsgocards89
planet pujolsian wrote:Which 2 of 3 receivers would you start? Don't laugh at my crappy options; I'm seriously weak at WR. They're all playing pretty crappy pass defenses.
Holt v. Dolphins
Gage v. Lions
Berrian v. Bears
I'd say Gage and Holt also, but the Rams are so unpredictable these days
Re: Fantasy Football - Start em, sit em
Posted: November 26 08, 11:12 am
by JCShutout
planet pujolsian wrote:Which 2 of 3 receivers would you start? Don't laugh at my crappy options; I'm seriously weak at WR. They're all playing pretty crappy pass defenses.
Holt v. Dolphins
Gage v. Lions
Berrian v. Bears
Those aren't terrible options. Holt was suppossed to be a solid top WR, and Berrian has a very good fantasy playoff schedule.
I'd go with Holt and Gage as well.
What WRs are on your waiver wire?
Re: Fantasy Football - Start em, sit em
Posted: November 30 08, 6:53 am
by letsgocards89
Who's gonna give up more points?
Tampa Bay D (@ home) VS. New Orleans
or
Oakland D (@ home) VS. Kansas City
or
Minnesota D (@ home) VS. Chicago
New Orleans is bad on the road, but Tampa gave up 20 to the Lions last week.
Oakland is either going to be great or terrible against KC, but KC sucks and Oakland's D is fairly good.
I can't decide which Minnesota team will show up against Chicago, the one that shut down Jacksonville last week, or the one that gave up a gazillion points to the Bears a few weeks back.
My league detracts a point for every Point Against, and adds 6 points for every DTD (including punt and kick returns) and +2 for INT or Fumble Recoveries. Last week TB was -2 against Detroit, Minnesota was +4 against Jacksonville, and Oakland was a 0 against Denver. Westbrook and Chris Johnson gave me a darn good start this week, and I don't want to give it all back by starting a crappy D.
Re: Fantasy Football - Start em, sit em
Posted: December 1 08, 6:30 am
by letsgocards89
letsgocards89 wrote:Who's gonna give up more points?
Tampa Bay D (@ home) VS. New Orleans
or
Oakland D (@ home) VS. Kansas City
or
Minnesota D (@ home) VS. Chicago
New Orleans is bad on the road, but Tampa gave up 20 to the Lions last week.
Oakland is either going to be great or terrible against KC, but KC sucks and Oakland's D is fairly good.
I can't decide which Minnesota team will show up against Chicago, the one that shut down Jacksonville last week, or the one that gave up a gazillion points to the Bears a few weeks back.
My league detracts a point for every Point Against, and adds 6 points for every DTD (including punt and kick returns) and +2 for INT or Fumble Recoveries. Last week TB was -2 against Detroit, Minnesota was +4 against Jacksonville, and Oakland was a 0 against Denver. Westbrook and Chris Johnson gave me a darn good start this week, and I don't want to give it all back by starting a crappy D.
Oakland -18
Tampa - 14
Minnesota -8
I went Tampa, shoulda went with the Purple People Eaters.
Re: Fantasy Football - Start em, sit em
Posted: December 4 08, 5:06 pm
by planet planet
Who should I start, an injured Clinton Portis against a stout Baltimore run D or Reggie Bush against Atlanta?
Re: Fantasy Football - Start em, sit em
Posted: December 5 08, 5:30 pm
by TheoSqua
planet pujolsian wrote:Who should I start, an injured Clinton Portis against a stout Baltimore run D or Reggie Bush against Atlanta?
Reggie Bush
But it's a risky proposition.