Page 3 of 3
Re: 2011 Cards vs. 2005 Cards
Posted: February 23 11, 8:00 pm
by Fat Strat
Bump.
We won in 2005 without Rolen. We can do it in 2011 without Wainwright.
Re: 2011 Cards vs. 2005 Cards
Posted: February 23 11, 8:06 pm
by Lesson
Fat Strat wrote:Bump.
We won in 2005 without Rolen. We can do it in 2011 without Wainwright.
Who is 2011's Abraham Nunez?
Re: 2011 Cards vs. 2005 Cards
Posted: February 23 11, 9:02 pm
by Schlich
cardslesson101 wrote:Fat Strat wrote:Bump.
We won in 2005 without Rolen. We can do it in 2011 without Wainwright.
Who is 2011's Abraham Nunez?
Someone has been reading too much VEB
I'm gonna say Ian Snell.
Re: 2011 Cards vs. 2005 Cards
Posted: May 20 11, 9:10 am
by Fat Strat
Fat Strat wrote:That’s an overall advantage for 2011 of 6 WAR. Do you think the ’11 Cards could be 6 wins better than an ’05 Cards team that won 100? It’s comical to think about, but if that doesn’t put you in a better mood about the club, then I don’t know what else will.
Go Cards! We’re going to win 106 games!
BUMP
So, I was wrong. The Cards probably aren't going to win 106 games. Instead, they're on pace to win 94 games, and they are playing 1 game behind their pythag. That means 95 wins. In 2005, the Cards outplayed their pythag by 2 runs. Since, we're comparing this club to that club and assuming "everything goes right" add those onto our record and we're on pace to win 97 games!
If you aren't enjoying this Cardinals team there is something wrong with you. Sure, we've blown saves. Sure, we've kicked and booted more balls than a 7th grade soccer team. But, we just keep winning.
I'm on record now as predicting 95 wins for the Cards, best record in baseball.
Re: 2011 Cards vs. 2005 Cards
Posted: June 7 11, 9:28 pm
by Fat Strat
Bump again.
Now on pace for 97 wins. On this day in 2005, the Cards were 38-20. Our Cards are 37-25.
Boy, those '05 guys got off to a seriously good start.
Re: 2011 Cards vs. 2005 Cards
Posted: June 7 11, 9:32 pm
by cards2468
I'll take the 2005 Cardinals, but this team is worth watching.
Re: 2011 Cards vs. 2005 Cards
Posted: June 7 11, 11:22 pm
by Bo Hart
cards2468 wrote:I'll take the 2005 Cardinals, but this team is worth watching.
Agree.
Re: 2011 Cards vs. 2005 Cards
Posted: June 8 11, 2:47 am
by AdmiralKird
Wainwright's WAR added into the equation is really going to help the 2011 team. I'm confused as to why he is added but Scott Rolen for 2005 isn't.
Re: 2011 Cards vs. 2005 Cards
Posted: June 8 11, 3:03 am
by Schlich
AdmiralKird wrote:Wainwright's WAR added into the equation is really going to help the 2011 team. I'm confused as to why he is added but Scott Rolen for 2005 isn't.
The original post was made in february.
Re: 2011 Cards vs. 2005 Cards
Posted: June 8 11, 3:16 am
by AdmiralKird
RxOfCowbell wrote:AdmiralKird wrote:Wainwright's WAR added into the equation is really going to help the 2011 team. I'm confused as to why he is added but Scott Rolen for 2005 isn't.
The original post was made in february.
