Re: 5/14 GDT: Cardinals(McGreevy) @ Athletics(Lopez) 2:05 PM CT
Posted: May 14 26, 5:29 pm
Glad I went out and mowed in the 7th. If I would have watched I might have jibed that comeback win.
A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
https://gatewayredbirds.com/forum/
He has options and your big FA addition Stanky, doesn't.cardsfantx wrote: ↑May 14 26, 5:27 pmI'm not sure why Fernandez was ever sent down; was great here and has been good in Memphisphins wrote: ↑May 14 26, 4:06 pmRajcic can bring his magic! Plus bring Fernandez back up.InvincibleCakeEater wrote: ↑May 14 26, 3:50 pmThis team is downright fun, but [expletive] do we need a bullpen.
Lol very truephins wrote: ↑May 14 26, 7:09 pmHe has options and your big FA addition Stanky, doesn't.cardsfantx wrote: ↑May 14 26, 5:27 pmI'm not sure why Fernandez was ever sent down; was great here and has been good in Memphisphins wrote: ↑May 14 26, 4:06 pmRajcic can bring his magic! Plus bring Fernandez back up.InvincibleCakeEater wrote: ↑May 14 26, 3:50 pmThis team is downright fun, but [expletive] do we need a bullpen.
I wasn't watching till the 9th, so I don't if this statement is true, but Oli said "there were a lot of balls hit right at people", implying that McGreevy wasn't as sharp as his stat line suggested he was.CardsofSTL wrote: ↑May 14 26, 3:07 pmI am not going to pick on Stank just now because he has been doing a little better but how do you not let McGreevy pitch the 7th; unless he told them he was feeling fatigue or something? Doesn't make sense to me.
This is true.dmarx114 wrote: ↑May 15 26, 8:14 amI wasn't watching till the 9th, so I don't if this statement is true, but Oli said "there were a lot of balls hit right at people", implying that McGreevy wasn't as sharp as his stat line suggested he was.CardsofSTL wrote: ↑May 14 26, 3:07 pmI am not going to pick on Stank just now because he has been doing a little better but how do you not let McGreevy pitch the 7th; unless he told them he was feeling fatigue or something? Doesn't make sense to me.
That might be true but you can probably say that of every McGreevy start.phins wrote: ↑May 15 26, 9:51 amThis is true.dmarx114 wrote: ↑May 15 26, 8:14 amI wasn't watching till the 9th, so I don't if this statement is true, but Oli said "there were a lot of balls hit right at people", implying that McGreevy wasn't as sharp as his stat line suggested he was.CardsofSTL wrote: ↑May 14 26, 3:07 pmI am not going to pick on Stank just now because he has been doing a little better but how do you not let McGreevy pitch the 7th; unless he told them he was feeling fatigue or something? Doesn't make sense to me.