Re: My prediction: We sign Robert for a total of $65 mil. Yo
Posted: May 23 17, 11:16 am
Do Goold's actual articles (the ones that the FO reads, I guess) have that level of fire in them?
A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
https://gatewayredbirds.com/forum/
NoFamous Mortimer wrote:Do Goold's actual articles (the ones that the FO reads, I guess) have that level of fire in them?
Yes.Famous Mortimer wrote:Ah well. He's asking us to hold the FO accountable, but isn't that kind-of his job?
pioneer98 wrote:This site says the Cardinals revenue in 2016 was $310 million:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/196 ... ince-2006/
The Cards' 25 man opening day payroll in 2016 was $145 million:
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/compe ... cardinals/
So that's like 46.7% for 2016. The number vary depending on which ones you use (25 man vs 40 man for example). But the trend is clearly downward since 2005 no matter how you really look at it.
Admittedly, there are some discrepancies that I haven't looked over yet.Socnorb11 wrote:pioneer98 wrote:This site says the Cardinals revenue in 2016 was $310 million:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/196 ... ince-2006/
The Cards' 25 man opening day payroll in 2016 was $145 million:
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/compe ... cardinals/
So that's like 46.7% for 2016. The number vary depending on which ones you use (25 man vs 40 man for example). But the trend is clearly downward since 2005 no matter how you really look at it.
How does that number compare to other teams?
MrCrowesGarden wrote:Yes.Famous Mortimer wrote:Ah well. He's asking us to hold the FO accountable, but isn't that kind-of his job?
I've accused Goold/P-D of being just extended PR firms for the Cardinals for some time, but I really think he feels stunned by this one. Maybe this is the straw that broke this camel's back. It all goes back to the idea of "if you're not going to spend on this guy, when are you?"
Spider John wrote:MrCrowesGarden wrote:Yes.Famous Mortimer wrote:Ah well. He's asking us to hold the FO accountable, but isn't that kind-of his job?
I've accused Goold/P-D of being just extended PR firms for the Cardinals for some time, but I really think he feels stunned by this one. Maybe this is the straw that broke this camel's back. It all goes back to the idea of "if you're not going to spend on this guy, when are you?"
Goold is the beat reporter, so I think he's supposed to get the news, and not give opinions. That's the columnist job.
I read most of his chats, and he does take the team to task when needed.
MrCrowesGarden wrote:Spider John wrote:MrCrowesGarden wrote:Yes.Famous Mortimer wrote:Ah well. He's asking us to hold the FO accountable, but isn't that kind-of his job?
I've accused Goold/P-D of being just extended PR firms for the Cardinals for some time, but I really think he feels stunned by this one. Maybe this is the straw that broke this camel's back. It all goes back to the idea of "if you're not going to spend on this guy, when are you?"
Goold is the beat reporter, so I think he's supposed to get the news, and not give opinions. That's the columnist job.
I read most of his chats, and he does take the team to task when needed.
It's not his job to be a mouthpiece for the organization, which has happened in the past.