Edmonds heading to San Diego

Classic threads for your viewing pleasure.
Locked
User avatar
UK
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 4263
Joined: December 10 06, 6:41 pm
Location: Baseball Purgatory.

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by UK »

Fat Strat wrote: Thanks. Good stuff. Very good stuff. I like it.

Incidentally, how does he compare to Allen Craig, if you've scouted him at all? Did we upgrade?
Never seen him play, the things I've read on him...

Good hitter but lacks polish , no defensive position for him and has struggled to stay healthy.

jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by jim »

Colbert Rasmols wrote:
thrill wrote:My optimism is hoping that it is going to allow them to deal Rolen for something good and be able to pay part of his salary.
That seems like a reasonable thought, though I think DeWitt could probably afford to keep Edmonds *and* include cash in a Rolen trade. They could possibly get a more generous return for Rolen, if the Edmonds cash is included along with Rolen.

But unless we're able to get a better return than I expect, I'm still opposed to trading Rolen at this time.
At this point, does it matter?

Actually a Rolen trade made much more sense than this one, unless this 5 year college B rated prospect is better than I think. Edmonds doesn't hold you back for '08, Rolen could if he isn't healthy. I have zero problem playing for the future, but I think there was an opportunity to at least be on the fringes of competing in '07 as well. Obviously, Mo didn't.

After this trade, if it's possible, the Izturis signing makes even less sense.

Trading Edmonds makes sense to me if and only if:
- It's decided that Rasmus is best served as the everyday CF'er NOW.
- Money saved is put back into the product on the field - maybe a restructure of a certain #5 to make sure he's wearing Cardinal red past 2011 or maybe a big trade with Rolen to bring something in where we can eat some of Rolen's contract as mentioned above.
- This dude they picked up is better than what I think he is.

Colbert Rasmols
All-Star
Posts: 1719
Joined: May 26 07, 10:11 am
Location: Formerly C2kSomething

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by Colbert Rasmols »

Before the Edmonds trade, my stance on Rolen was this:

I don't expect much in return. Therefore, I'd rather we take the risk of keeping him. Hopefully his trade value rises, and he can be dealt in July or next offseason.

The Edmonds trade doesn't change the way I feel about the Rolen situation.

User avatar
jdk82
All-Star
Posts: 2881
Joined: April 4 07, 8:58 pm
Location: Iowa

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by jdk82 »

jim wrote: - This dude they picked up is better than what I think he is.
Maybe I missed it but what dont you like about him?

User avatar
fanforever
Retired
Posts: 67125
Joined: April 17 06, 5:03 pm
Location: Northern NJ-The Twilight Zone

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by fanforever »

well...it's offical
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/wire?sec ... id=3155793
Saturday, December 15, 2007
Padres to get Edmonds, cash from Cardinals for minor leaguer

Associated Press

SAN DIEGO -- Jim Edmonds is returning to Southern California, this time as a member of the San Diego Padres.

The Padres obtained the 37-year-old center fielder and cash from the St. Louis Cardinals on Saturday for a minor leaguer. The deal needed approval of the commissioner's office because the Cardinals are sending approximately $1 million to the Padres to help offset Edmonds' 2008 salary.

The deal came about quickly after the agent for free agent center fielder Mike Cameron broke off talks with the Padres on Friday.

The Cardinals will get minor league third baseman David Freese.

Edmonds grew up in Diamond Bar in Los Angeles County and was drafted by the Angels in 1988. He played for the Angels from late in the 1993 season until being traded to St. Louis just before the 2000 season.

Edmonds was slowed by injuries last season but the eight-time Gold Glove winner recently pronounced himself fit.

The acquisition of Edmonds came after the Padres were spurned by three outfielders in less than a week.

Cameron's agent broke off negotiations for a deal to bring back the center fielder on Friday. Cameron is suspended for the first 25 games of 2008 after testing positive a second time for a banned stimulant.

Last weekend, left fielder Milton Bradley accepted a one-year deal from the Texas Rangers worth approximately $5 million. The Padres had offered $4 million to bring back Bradley.

Plus, the Padres lost out in the bidding for Japanese outfielder Kosuke Fukudome, who signed with the Chicago Cubs.

Padres right fielder Brian Giles is coming off microfracture surgery on his right knee. The Padres have expressed interest in signing free agent Geoff Jenkins.

Edmonds and the Cardinals beat the Padres in the opening round of the playoffs in both 2005 and 2006.

After the Cardinals won the 2006 World Series, the four-time All-Star had operations on his right shoulder and left toe. He batted just .222 in April.

"I wasn't even close to healthy," he said last month.

Edmonds wound up batting .252 with 12 homers and 53 RBIs -- his lowest totals since 1999 with the Angels. But heading into the final season of a $19 million, two-year contract, he expects much better production from himself next season.

"Everything is gone now and I'm feeling really good," he said. "I'm feeling the best I've felt in five or six years. I'm already working out and already running and doing some things that I need to do."

Edmonds appeared in the postseason with the Cardinals in six of the last eight seasons, including two World Series.

The Padres fell one victory short of making it to the playoffs for the third straight season. San Diego hasn't won a postseason series since 1998.

the 24-year-old Freese batted .302 with 17 homers and 96 RBIs with Single-A Lake Elsinore.

User avatar
haltz
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 22630
Joined: November 9 06, 6:45 am
Location: a proud midwestern metropolis

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by haltz »

GatewaySnayke wrote:The Edmonds trade has opened up the door to so many great things in 2008.
LOL

User avatar
BW23
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12896
Joined: July 7 06, 11:08 pm

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by BW23 »

UK wrote:
BW23 wrote:
This probably kills my wish of them continuing to pursue DeWitt.
Dewitt was scouted alot more heavily than Freese coming out of HS, I'm sure by STL as well. If they want him, it takes two to tango.
They scouted him much less than almost any team. But they've tried to get him lately. I was hoping they'd get him this winter.

jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by jim »

jdk82 wrote:
jim wrote: - This dude they picked up is better than what I think he is.
Maybe I missed it but what dont you like about him?
I don't know him at all, I'm just suspicious that a player drafted in the 9th round at age 23 probably isn't anything special. He was rated as the Padres 15th best prospect last season, and I'm being told by reputable people he will be a top 10 in our system. So he's on the radar, but certainly not a blue chipper.

Guys with credentials like that sometimes turn out to be useful players. There is certainly value in that, but not enough for me to throw any chance at all of competing out the door in '08.

Edmonds was 1 year, 8M. No infringement on '09, just a 1 year gamble on '08. How many times have we said "There are no such things as bad one year contracts"? A border line HOF'er, a fan favorite, and a 1 year contract. But we dump that, and sign what might actually be the definition of a bad 1 year contract (Izturis)?

That's what i don't get. I'm hoping something happens where it's a Eureka moment with me, where all the lights come on and the grand master plan becomes clear in my brain. Until then, I'm left scratching my head.

User avatar
jdk82
All-Star
Posts: 2881
Joined: April 4 07, 8:58 pm
Location: Iowa

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by jdk82 »

jim wrote:
jdk82 wrote:
jim wrote: - This dude they picked up is better than what I think he is.
Maybe I missed it but what dont you like about him?
I don't know him at all, I'm just suspicious that a player drafted in the 9th round at age 23 probably isn't anything special. He was rated as the Padres 15th best prospect last season, and I'm being told by reputable people he will be a top 10 in our system. So he's on the radar, but certainly not a blue chipper.

Guys with credentials like that sometimes turn out to be useful players. There is certainly value in that, but not enough for me to throw any chance at all of competing out the door in '08.

Edmonds was 1 year, 8M. No infringement on '09, just a 1 year gamble on '08. How many times have we said "There are no such things as bad one year contracts"? A border line HOF'er, a fan favorite, and a 1 year contract. But we dump that, and sign what might actually be the definition of a bad 1 year contract (Izturis)?

That's what i don't get. I'm hoping something happens where it's a Eureka moment with me, where all the lights come on and the grand master plan becomes clear in my brain. Until then, I'm left scratching my head.
As far as the round he was drafted in he was a 5th year senior without any option left and to get drafted in the 9th round is pretty darn good. He would have been in AA last year if not for Chase Headlely the Padres top prospect who also plays third. No question this guy can hit the ball, he has hit whereever he has been, fielding on the other hand was suspect which apparently got better as he was voted as the best defender at 3B in the California league.

Cardinals gave 2 million to the Padres so we will see how the Cardinals spend that 6 million or if they just keep it. Definately will be able to judge things better once we know that.

jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by jim »

jdk82 wrote:
jim wrote:
jdk82 wrote:
jim wrote: - This dude they picked up is better than what I think he is.
Maybe I missed it but what dont you like about him?
I don't know him at all, I'm just suspicious that a player drafted in the 9th round at age 23 probably isn't anything special. He was rated as the Padres 15th best prospect last season, and I'm being told by reputable people he will be a top 10 in our system. So he's on the radar, but certainly not a blue chipper.

Guys with credentials like that sometimes turn out to be useful players. There is certainly value in that, but not enough for me to throw any chance at all of competing out the door in '08.

Edmonds was 1 year, 8M. No infringement on '09, just a 1 year gamble on '08. How many times have we said "There are no such things as bad one year contracts"? A border line HOF'er, a fan favorite, and a 1 year contract. But we dump that, and sign what might actually be the definition of a bad 1 year contract (Izturis)?

That's what i don't get. I'm hoping something happens where it's a Eureka moment with me, where all the lights come on and the grand master plan becomes clear in my brain. Until then, I'm left scratching my head.
As far as the round he was drafted in he was a 5th year senior without any option left and to get drafted in the 9th round is pretty darn good. He would have been in AA last year if not for Chase Headlely the Padres top prospect who also plays third. No question this guy can hit the ball, he has hit whereever he has been, fielding on the other hand was suspect which apparently got better as he was voted as the best defender at 3B in the California league.

Cardinals gave 2 million to the Padres so we will see how the Cardinals spend that 6 million or if they just keep it. Definately will be able to judge things better once we know that.
Time will tell, you just don't often hear of guys staying in school 5 years that make an impact. Most guys are coming out in 3, not 5. I'm not saying it isn't possible he slipped through the cracks, it just makes me raise my eyebrows a little. The guy is entering his peak years in AA.

I didn't realize we gave SD $2M. That was awful nice of us.

Locked