Colbert Rasmols wrote:thrill wrote:My optimism is hoping that it is going to allow them to deal Rolen for something good and be able to pay part of his salary.
That seems like a reasonable thought, though I think DeWitt could probably afford to keep Edmonds *and* include cash in a Rolen trade. They could possibly get a more generous return for Rolen, if the Edmonds cash is included along with Rolen.
But unless we're able to get a better return than I expect, I'm still opposed to trading Rolen at this time.
At this point, does it matter?
Actually a Rolen trade made much more sense than this one, unless this 5 year college B rated prospect is better than I think. Edmonds doesn't hold you back for '08, Rolen could if he isn't healthy. I have zero problem playing for the future, but I think there was an opportunity to at least be on the fringes of competing in '07 as well. Obviously, Mo didn't.
After this trade, if it's possible, the Izturis signing makes even less sense.
Trading Edmonds makes sense to me if and only if:
- It's decided that Rasmus is best served as the everyday CF'er NOW.
- Money saved is put back into the product on the field - maybe a restructure of a certain #5 to make sure he's wearing Cardinal red past 2011 or maybe a big trade with Rolen to bring something in where we can eat some of Rolen's contract as mentioned above.
- This dude they picked up is better than what I think he is.