Re: My prediction: We sign Robert for a total of $65 mil. Yo
Posted: May 25 17, 12:01 pm
All this talk about money...
A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
https://gatewayredbirds.com/forum/
Let's exhume him and see what we've got.CardsofSTL wrote:All this talk about money...
One would hope they'd think "if a bunch of people thought I was the best prospect they'd seen in decades, I'd probably get a decent payday too".AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:I've been thinking about this more than a healthy amount of time now and one thing that hasn't been mentioned yet that probably factored into the decision...
If the Cardinals had signed him to a (let's say) $30M bonus and paid a $30M tax. That's 6 years, presumably, of MLB control for a total payment of $60M+his contract.
How would that sit with the current players? Marp is on a 6 year/52M deal. It would cost more in bonus to sign this guy than they will pay Carp for 6 years of baseball. Gyorko is 6/32 i think. Same thing. I know it's not something we think about, but Robert would have become one of the top paid players before he ever set foot on the field. You'd like to think the players understand the scenario, but I can certainly envision that not being the best for morale in the short term. What is good for morale, obviously, is winning. So, if he helps with that, then it is probably a moot point. Still...something to think about.
Maybe those guys shouldn't have signed their team friendly extensions...AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:I've been thinking about this more than a healthy amount of time now and one thing that hasn't been mentioned yet that probably factored into the decision...
If the Cardinals had signed him to a (let's say) $30M bonus and paid a $30M tax. That's 6 years, presumably, of MLB control for a total payment of $60M+his contract.
How would that sit with the current players? Marp is on a 6 year/52M deal. It would cost more in bonus to sign this guy than they will pay Carp for 6 years of baseball. Gyorko is 6/32 i think. Same thing. I know it's not something we think about, but Robert would have become one of the top paid players before he ever set foot on the field. You'd like to think the players understand the scenario, but I can certainly envision that not being the best for morale in the short term. What is good for morale, obviously, is winning. So, if he helps with that, then it is probably a moot point. Still...something to think about.
CardsofSTL wrote:All this talk about money...
Which is a travesty when teams like the Barves are getting millions in public funds.Farewell Friends wrote:There is not a single team that would open their books for the public.