Page 28 of 140
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: December 16 17, 11:49 am
by ZigZagCardsFan
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: December 16 17, 1:33 pm
by TimChopsula
Hunter Pence has been working out like a mad man this offseason. His Instagram is worth a follow. It’ll be interesting to see if he’s able to put together a bounce-back season.
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: December 16 17, 1:38 pm
by ZigZagCardsFan
Wow.
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: December 16 17, 1:51 pm
by MinorLeagueGuy
Dayum, Gina.
If they'd been able to move those contracts a couple weeks ago, would they have been in play for Stanton?
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: December 16 17, 1:52 pm
by MrCrowesGarden
Who the Dodgers looking to add?
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: December 16 17, 1:53 pm
by ZigZagCardsFan
I doubt anybody in particular. This gets them under the luxury tax threshold to reset for next year's big FA class.
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: December 16 17, 1:56 pm
by ZigZagCardsFan
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: December 16 17, 1:59 pm
by MrCrowesGarden
ZigZagCardsFan wrote:I doubt anybody in particular. This gets them under the luxury tax threshold to reset for next year's big FA class.
It really helps the Braves more for the next class since they’re taking on the expirings. Helps the Dodgers now .
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: December 16 17, 2:01 pm
by ZigZagCardsFan
I stand corrected:
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: December 16 17, 2:04 pm
by Magneto2.0
Very interesting