The 2012 Mizzou Football Thread

A forum for non-baseball sports
Post Reply
User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: The 2012 Mizzou Football Thread

Post by JL21 »

phins wrote:On the bright side, Mizzou's got a defense. Wonder if Sheldon Richardson comes back?
No chance. At this point, he's just improving his draft stock.

AWvsCBsteeeerike3
"I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
Posts: 27559
Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Location: Thinking of the Children

Re: The 2012 Mizzou Football Thread

Post by AWvsCBsteeeerike3 »

Franklin looked horrible. He's looked horrible since the Georgia game. If he's hurt, then he needs to sit down. Of course, when he does that, everyone questions his toughness. It's one of 4 things:
1. He's hurt, it's causing him to play poorly overall, including wildly inaccurate passes, and when healthy he is better than he looks, but he needs to be sat until healthy.
2. He's hurt, it's not causing him to play poorly and he is just a bad QB.
3. He's not hurt and he is a bad QB.
4. He's hurt, it's causing him to play poorly overall, but he's still a better option than Berkstresser.

I can't imagine #4 being the right option, especially considering the season is lost and Berkstresser is going to be a better QB than Franklin in the future. Just get him in there and let him play. Sticking with Franklin is pointless, imo.

Fair or not, Franklin has been the biggest disappointment in a disappointing season. Maybe the coaching philosophy of sticking with an offensive scheme that at times has looked shaky... But, for me its Franklin looking liek [expletive].

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: The 2012 Mizzou Football Thread

Post by JL21 »

85% Franklin is still a [expletive] load better than 100% Berkstresser. It's not even close.

#4 is the most accurate by far. Did you see the Kentucky game? Alabama? 3/4 of the Vandy game? Berkstresser has clearly had a shot and he's looked horrible. Franklin made some huge mistakes in the game, but he had some success mixed around it. Berkstresser just makes the mistakes without the success. And Franklin looked great against Vandy until he got hurt with a SECOND injury. Bill Connelly at RMN hit it out of the park:

http://www.rockmnation.com/2012/11/4/35 ... eflections
Despite the worst accuracy problems of his career (and I'm not even talking about the passes he made under pressure -- I'm talking about the passes he made when attempting to step into them properly in the pocket), James Franklin led a strong offensive effort against the second-best defense in the country. With Franklin, Mizzou averaged more yards per play against Florida than Mizzou did with Corbin Berkstresser against Kentucky, the same Kentucky that allowed 40 points to Vanderbilt yesterday. As I wrote in last week's BTBS post, I'm not giving up on Berkstresser. But I've basically given up on him in the short term. He got almost four full games to prove himself capable of playing good offense in 2012. He didn't do it.

That Mizzou was able to move the ball against Florida, even with Franklin unable to throw an accurate pass more than about seven yards, ends the argument. With a healthy Franklin that wasn't coming back from his third extended absence of the last six months, Mizzou goes for over 400 yards. With the evidence at hand, we can't even guarantee Berkstresser gains 200 yesterday. The bad passes were incredibly frustrating. But Mizzou still gained 339 yards against, again, the second-best defense in the country. And again, that was more than Texas A&M or Georgia gained. That means something.
They have three games left, and the season is NOT lost because two wins means a bowl game and an extra month of practices, which can't be understated. Going with Berkstresser means taking a tiny chance at improving your backup QB while sacrificing a month's worth of improvement at every other position on the field.

I'd also add that there's a decent chance Berkstresser isn't even the #2 next year. If this season has been any indication, there's a good chance Mauk will leapfrog him. So you're throwing away a month of practice for a guy with a decent chance at being a career backup at Mizzou.

User avatar
redbirdjazzz
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 4921
Joined: April 17 06, 10:50 am
Location: Columbia, MO

Re: The 2012 Mizzou Football Thread

Post by redbirdjazzz »

JL21 wrote:85% Franklin is still a [expletive] load better than 100% Berkstresser. It's not even close.

#4 is the most accurate by far. Did you see the Kentucky game? Alabama? 3/4 of the Vandy game? Berkstresser has clearly had a shot and he's looked horrible. Franklin made some huge mistakes in the game, but he had some success mixed around it. Berkstresser just makes the mistakes without the success. And Franklin looked great against Vandy until he got hurt with a SECOND injury. Bill Connelly at RMN hit it out of the park:

http://www.rockmnation.com/2012/11/4/35 ... eflections
Despite the worst accuracy problems of his career (and I'm not even talking about the passes he made under pressure -- I'm talking about the passes he made when attempting to step into them properly in the pocket), James Franklin led a strong offensive effort against the second-best defense in the country. With Franklin, Mizzou averaged more yards per play against Florida than Mizzou did with Corbin Berkstresser against Kentucky, the same Kentucky that allowed 40 points to Vanderbilt yesterday. As I wrote in last week's BTBS post, I'm not giving up on Berkstresser. But I've basically given up on him in the short term. He got almost four full games to prove himself capable of playing good offense in 2012. He didn't do it.

That Mizzou was able to move the ball against Florida, even with Franklin unable to throw an accurate pass more than about seven yards, ends the argument. With a healthy Franklin that wasn't coming back from his third extended absence of the last six months, Mizzou goes for over 400 yards. With the evidence at hand, we can't even guarantee Berkstresser gains 200 yesterday. The bad passes were incredibly frustrating. But Mizzou still gained 339 yards against, again, the second-best defense in the country. And again, that was more than Texas A&M or Georgia gained. That means something.
They have three games left, and the season is NOT lost because two wins means a bowl game and an extra month of practices, which can't be understated. Going with Berkstresser means taking a tiny chance at improving your backup QB while sacrificing a month's worth of improvement at every other position on the field.

I'd also add that there's a decent chance Berkstresser isn't even the #2 next year. If this season has been any indication, there's a good chance Mauk will leapfrog him. So you're throwing away a month of practice for a guy with a decent chance at being a career backup at Mizzou.
++
I was at the Vandy game, and Berkstresser was terrible. They were moving the ball almost at will until Franklin got hurt, and would've probably had touchdowns instead of those FGs if not for a couple of drops.

User avatar
robbotis
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 4791
Joined: April 18 06, 7:05 am
Location: Minneapolis

Re: The 2012 Mizzou Football Thread

Post by robbotis »

Hopefully, Maul leapfrogs all of them next year.
I know it's hype and scouting reports, but I'm wishful Mauk is the new Chase Daniel. Air it out mang.

User avatar
cardsfansince82
is shooing asian children away from his fridge.
Posts: 27776
Joined: May 17 06, 10:23 pm
Location: at the gettin' place

Re: The 2012 Mizzou Football Thread

Post by cardsfansince82 »

Today is the 15th anniversary of the Flea Kicker game against Nebraska. It's on espn classic right now.

Vidor
You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
Posts: 22956
Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm

Re: The 2012 Mizzou Football Thread

Post by Vidor »

Congratulations to Missouri for beating a real SEC team and likely earning Derek Dooley a pink slip.

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37260
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: The 2012 Mizzou Football Thread

Post by lukethedrifter »

replay on espn3 http://espn.go.com/watchespn/player/_/s ... id/639519/

can skip ahead to the good parts

Spider John
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 10948
Joined: May 18 06, 10:09 pm
Location: East of the middle of West Tennessee

Re: The 2012 Mizzou Football Thread

Post by Spider John »

Vidor wrote:Congratulations to Missouri for beating a real SEC team and likely earning Derek Dooley a pink slip.
Not many down here would call UT a real SEC team these days.

There's a lot of noise that says UT's next hire will be Jon Gruden.

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37260
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: The 2012 Mizzou Football Thread

Post by lukethedrifter »

Heard Bernie say that Sheldon Richardson had been suspended. Sounds like he's checked out as an MU student.

Post Reply