Cardinal's franchise player

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball

Who's our franchise player now?

Carp
18
25%
Waino
28
38%
Holliday
18
25%
Yadi
6
8%
Freese
2
3%
Berkman
0
No votes
other
1
1%
 
Total votes: 73

User avatar
OmahaCard79
Veteran Player
Posts: 1100
Joined: May 23 06, 1:02 pm

Re: Cardinal's franchise player

Post by OmahaCard79 »

cards2468 wrote:
maddash wrote:I wouldn't put McGwire on that list, but that's just me.
McGwire was about the only reason people went to games in '98 and '99. He may not have been the face for long, but he was a pretty significant figure while he was here.
He's not in the mold of the rest of them, but he was an immense of a figure as there's been in STL baseball history for a short time. That's why I simply couldn't leave him off.

From 1997-2000, it really was the big mac show. Alot of people in the stands didn't even know the scores of the games and were just there to watch him hit. So, I'd say from 1997-2001, he qualified as the face of the franchise.

maddash
is eerily well-versed on Project Runway and irony
Posts: 8508
Joined: June 26 06, 3:07 pm

Re: Cardinal's franchise player

Post by maddash »

cards2468 wrote:
maddash wrote:I wouldn't put McGwire on that list, but that's just me.
McGwire was about the only reason people went to games in '98 and '99. He may not have been the face for long, but he was a pretty significant figure while he was here.
He brought major media attention to the Cards, no doubt about it, but I think in the end he was a ball player archiving great personal feats while wearing a Cardinals uniform. If you're going to stack him up against the other players listed, I don't know if it's the same thing. What was McGwire's big play that helped the team? I can't really think of one. If we're just talking about the face of the franchise at the moment, yeah he's that. But the list Omaha made, I just don't see him on it.

User avatar
OmahaCard79
Veteran Player
Posts: 1100
Joined: May 23 06, 1:02 pm

Re: Cardinal's franchise player

Post by OmahaCard79 »

maddash wrote:
cards2468 wrote:
maddash wrote:I wouldn't put McGwire on that list, but that's just me.
McGwire was about the only reason people went to games in '98 and '99. He may not have been the face for long, but he was a pretty significant figure while he was here.
He brought major media attention to the Cards, no doubt about it, but I think in the end he was a ball player archiving great personal feats while wearing a Cardinals uniform. If you're going to stack him up against the other players listed, I don't know if it's the same thing. What was McGwire's big play that helped the team? I can't really think of one. If we're just talking about the face of the franchise at the moment, yeah he's that. But the list Omaha made, I just don't see him on it.
I don't consider him a Cardinals all-time great by any means, don't misunderstand, but if you're simply talking about "face of the franchise" there really wasn't a more talked about persona in all of baseball between 1997-2001 than McGwire.

When anyone nationally talked about the Cardinals, it was McGwire. Part of that was because there wasn't much else to talk about with that team from 1997-1999, but still, he was big time.

Just because all of that has been lost now, doesn't change what he meant to that team in that moment. Without McGwire, there's no 3,000,000 fans in 1998 and 1999. If you think about it, without him that could have altered the course of the franchise in the 00's and maybe TLR gets fired, maybe they don't go on the same run from 2000-2011. Who knows, but no matter what, McGwire was a huge presence in the history of the franchise for the time he was here. Explains why they had a statue commisioned of him before he ever even was on the hall of fame ballot.

User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 30920
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: Cardinal's franchise player

Post by Popeye_Card »

I went with Yadi. He does have some national appeal. Friends of mine that are fans of other teams (a lot of them AL teams) always like Yadi, especially after they see one of his lasers to 2nd or a pickoff.

OK, maybe my Reds fan friends don't care much for Yadi after the Phillips incident.

jeffbgoofy
All-Star
Posts: 2208
Joined: March 17 08, 1:02 pm
Location: St. Louis, MO
Contact:

Re: Cardinal's franchise player

Post by jeffbgoofy »

Why do you have to have a franchise player? I think this is one thing that makes the Cardinals so great is that the name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back.

User avatar
Jmodene
Still waiting for someone to use a Weird Al song
Posts: 15528
Joined: April 18 06, 5:54 pm
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Re: Cardinal's franchise player

Post by Jmodene »

A lot of this depends on how you define "franchise player". In my mind, it's the guy who's on all the ESPN promos involving the team. Thus, in recent years, it has indeed been Pujols. Now, it's probably Carpenter. In the late '90's, of course it was McGwire, and prior to 1997, it was Ozzie.

Jocephus
99% conan clips
Posts: 64992
Joined: April 18 06, 5:14 pm

Re: Cardinal's franchise player

Post by Jocephus »

ilstu24 wrote:John Mozeliak
Bernie: Mozeliak now Cards' main man
http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/ ... 010f6.html

JohnDoolittle
Veteran Player
Posts: 743
Joined: April 17 06, 8:04 am
Location: Central Missouri

Re: Cardinal's franchise player

Post by JohnDoolittle »

AdmiralKird wrote:Albert Pujols.
Huh. Thought Pujols was the face of greed. I cast my Cardinal vote for Adam Wainwright.

JohnDoolittle
Veteran Player
Posts: 743
Joined: April 17 06, 8:04 am
Location: Central Missouri

Re: Cardinal's franchise player

Post by JohnDoolittle »

AdmiralKird wrote:Albert Pujols.
Huh. Thought Pujols was the face of greed. I cast my Cardinal vote for Adam Wainwright.

User avatar
JoeMcKim
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 9248
Joined: September 8 09, 10:56 pm
Location: South County, St. Louis

Re: Cardinal's franchise player

Post by JoeMcKim »

I think Wainwright or Holliday can be the only correct answers to this. Since they're both arguably the best hitters/pitchers remaining on the team without either of them being 35 years or older. Sure we might get a few more good seasons out of Berkman, but not someone you can rely on still being a part of the team in 3 years from now.

Post Reply