Re: The 2012 Mizzou Football Thread
Posted: November 20 12, 9:42 am
Looks like I was incorrect and either Sheldon got contrite or Pinkel sold out cuz apparently Richardson is playing this week.
A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
https://gatewayredbirds.org/forum/
Ruth and Chappell were lost for the season before a game was played, and Meiners missed the first two weeks(also more later in the year). So there's 24 games of play without an SEC lineman touching anyone. This isn't a "Mizzou's tiny line got ground into dust by the SEC" situation(which is a false premise to begin with), this is "one third of our Offensive line rotation is gone off the bat, and then we had a normal to slightly above average number of OL injuries during the season"AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:You simply can't expect undersized linemen that are going to be overmatched time and again to stay healthy for an entire season. Hell you can't expect linemen to stay healthy anyway.Transmogrified Tiger wrote:In early August, Mizzou had a pretty clear top 6 offensive linemen that would shake out positionally in some combination based on performance. Of the 66 potential games those 6 could have played in, they have received about half of that. Also, their returning starter at QB has either been out with injury or slightly hampered with injury for the majority of the season. Making Mizzou's season a referendum on their coaching or their place in the conference is silly. There isn't a team in the country that can withstand literally losing half their offensive line and then their QB for a huge chunk of the season and still expect to excel. It simply doesn't happen.@Dave_Matter: Pinkel: If Missouri's 2007 team had the injuries this team has had, it would've won 7 or 8 games instead of 12
Again, going back to the 2007 season, I wonder how many games that team would have won if it had to match up against bigger lines, like oklahoma's or nebraska's, every week. It's always been their achilles under Pinkel and now it's going to be exposed worse than ever.
I really like Pinkel; I think we'd get along great and he seems like a genuine person. He shouldn't be coaching Mizzou going forward though. And, if he is still the coach, I very much hope he makes adjustments and gets some depth for his linemen as well as get a few bigger ones.
Ha.JL21 wrote:Why not just say "Congratulations on beating Mizzou for the first time since 2005" and let that statement be your dig?
The press release cited personal reasons. While I don't know anything other than what's been reported, from what I've read it doesn't sound like he's in play for another job right now.JL21 wrote:Without hearing the press conference or the logic, I'm going to pretend it's to go open a head shop in Boulder.
To tell the truth, I don't like that. Yost took a lot of [expletive] from fans but by and large, he was very successful in his run as the OC. He was responsible for the tremendous QB play Mizzou's had for 10 years (2012 notwithstanding).
I will miss the constant surfer references by color commentators.MrCrowesGarden wrote:The press release cited personal reasons. While I don't know anything other than what's been reported, from what I've read it doesn't sound like he's in play for another job right now.JL21 wrote:Without hearing the press conference or the logic, I'm going to pretend it's to go open a head shop in Boulder.
To tell the truth, I don't like that. Yost took a lot of [expletive] from fans but by and large, he was very successful in his run as the OC. He was responsible for the tremendous QB play Mizzou's had for 10 years (2012 notwithstanding).