Page 36 of 140
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: December 31 17, 10:40 am
by MinorLeagueGuy
Jocephus wrote:
I can tell from the way he's holding his pick that he's figured something out with his curveball grip, again.
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: January 1 18, 12:23 am
by JoeMcKim
I guess its a better offseason side project for him then last year when someone posted a trailed of Wainwright acting in a really terrible local independent movie.
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: January 2 18, 7:57 am
by MinorLeagueGuy
https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2018/01/ ... arket.html
Not excited about this group. Wouldn't mind taking a look at Tony Watson. But we're stuck with Cecil.. I said I thought the market would've been jump started by Davis's deal. But that hasn't seemed to happen. Which tells me there's a Lot more sniffing around on the trade market for arms than has been mentioned.
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: January 2 18, 11:35 am
by MrCrowesGarden
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: January 2 18, 11:53 am
by cardsfantx
MrCrowesGarden wrote:
yuck
the obv best upgrade left is donaldson, BUT if the jays are truly not going to trade donaldson...then i dunno
i may throw up on my keyboard, but i'd rather have LoMo on a 2-3 year deal and hope last year wasn't a fluke, then to get stuck with a 7/200 deal that boras is going to try and hold out for with hosmer
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: January 2 18, 12:04 pm
by Farewell Friends
Hosmer isn't sniffing $150 million, let alone $200 million. He'll get something similar to Santana.
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: January 2 18, 12:09 pm
by MrCrowesGarden
I think he’ll get more than Santana, but it won’t be $150 million. It’s probably around $100 million.
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: January 2 18, 12:12 pm
by Magneto2.0
cardsfantx wrote:MrCrowesGarden wrote:
yuck
the obv best upgrade left is donaldson, BUT if the jays are truly not going to trade donaldson...then i dunno
i may throw up on my keyboard, but i'd rather have LoMo on a 2-3 year deal and hope last year wasn't a fluke, then to get stuck with a 7/200 deal that boras is going to try and hold out for with hosmer
Cardinals are not giving Hosmer 200 million. At best we'll give him 5/100. I'm for it. It upgrades the team. And he's still young.
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: January 2 18, 12:14 pm
by cardsfantx
Farewell Friends wrote:Hosmer isn't sniffing $150 million, let alone $200 million. He'll get something similar to Santana.
he's getting a heck of a lot longer than 3 years being only 28...5-6 years min IMO...and i don't want him on a contract anywhere that long.
he signs a santana deal at 3/60? i'm game (though i'd rather have santana, but that ship has sailed)...but he's not going to sign for 3 years
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: January 2 18, 12:15 pm
by cardsfantx
MrCrowesGarden wrote:I think he’ll get more than Santana, but it won’t be $150 million. It’s probably around $100 million.
so, would you do a deal for hosmer at 5/100?
i wouldn't...i'd sign LoMo at a fraction of that price for 2-3 years instead