Oklahoma vs. Missouri

A forum for non-baseball sports
Post Reply
maddash
is eerily well-versed on Project Runway and irony
Posts: 8508
Joined: June 26 06, 3:07 pm

Re: Oklahoma vs. Missouri

Post by maddash »

If Oklahoma's D can keep this up it'll be a long game for MO. And it's not so much the man on man thing, OU just seems to know what's in Mizzou's playbook.

User avatar
cardsfansince82
is shooing asian children away from his fridge.
Posts: 27776
Joined: May 17 06, 10:23 pm
Location: at the gettin' place

Re: Oklahoma vs. Missouri

Post by cardsfansince82 »

That PI call was a gift.

maddash
is eerily well-versed on Project Runway and irony
Posts: 8508
Joined: June 26 06, 3:07 pm

Re: Oklahoma vs. Missouri

Post by maddash »

cardsfansince82 wrote:That PI call was a gift.
The one thing I hate about CF is the stupid interference calls. You don't want the secondary mugging the WRs, but jeeze, you look at a receiver the wrong way and they throw a flag.

User avatar
fanforever
Retired
Posts: 67125
Joined: April 17 06, 5:03 pm
Location: Northern NJ-The Twilight Zone

Re: Oklahoma vs. Missouri

Post by fanforever »

Oklahoma 7 Missouri 6

18 yard FG by Wolfert

maddash
is eerily well-versed on Project Runway and irony
Posts: 8508
Joined: June 26 06, 3:07 pm

Re: Oklahoma vs. Missouri

Post by maddash »

Speaking objectively - I guess I'm rooting for Mizzou, but I'm really not a fan of either team - the Sooners have much more attractive cheerleaders than the Tigers.

User avatar
cardsfansince82
is shooing asian children away from his fridge.
Posts: 27776
Joined: May 17 06, 10:23 pm
Location: at the gettin' place

Re: Oklahoma vs. Missouri

Post by cardsfansince82 »

maddash wrote:Speaking objectively - I guess I'm rooting for Mizzou, but I'm really not a fan of either team - the Sooners have much more attractive cheerleaders than the Tigers.
TIT.

Big stop by the Tigers.

User avatar
GatewaySnayke
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 11923
Joined: July 23 06, 11:54 pm
Location: GatewaySnaykebird

Re: Oklahoma vs. Missouri

Post by GatewaySnayke »

They have to pull out a better play call than that being one yard out. My gosh, they ran the play twice on the same drive. Did they not think OU was going to be ready for it?

OU looks like they know Mizzou's playbook because Mizzou's playbook is nothing but bubble screens. Mizzou's play-calling has been ultra-conservative.

User avatar
fanforever
Retired
Posts: 67125
Joined: April 17 06, 5:03 pm
Location: Northern NJ-The Twilight Zone

Re: Oklahoma vs. Missouri

Post by fanforever »

I was almost certain Mizzou would get in to the endzone on that last drive and OU did all they could to make what seemed like an easy 6 turn in to 3.

I was impressed with the effort put in to holding them to a FG.

Mizzou has held OU to 2 rushing yards which is impressive as well.

User avatar
GatewaySnayke
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 11923
Joined: July 23 06, 11:54 pm
Location: GatewaySnaykebird

Re: Oklahoma vs. Missouri

Post by GatewaySnayke »

One of the most futile drives all season long. Two balls chucked to the sidelines and another tossed into an area where OU defenders had it surrounded.

And apparently Jeremy Maclin is the only guy allowed to touch the ball.

User avatar
cardsfansince82
is shooing asian children away from his fridge.
Posts: 27776
Joined: May 17 06, 10:23 pm
Location: at the gettin' place

Re: Oklahoma vs. Missouri

Post by cardsfansince82 »

GatewaySnayke wrote:They have to pull out a better play call than that being one yard out. My gosh, they ran the play twice on the same drive. Did they not think OU was going to be ready for it?

OU looks like they know Mizzou's playbook because Mizzou's playbook is nothing but bubble screens. Mizzou's play-calling has been ultra-conservative.
That's what I hate about the spread. They don't seem to have enough plays for the short yardage situations. They need a traditional I-form package for those spots.

Post Reply