St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread

A forum for non-baseball sports
Post Reply
User avatar
Lesson
Grandmaster Flashchat
Posts: 6623
Joined: February 4 10, 4:35 pm

Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread

Post by Lesson »

InvincibleCakeEater wrote:TO to the Bengals. 1 year 2 million plus 2 million in incentives.
They wasted money on Bryant then.

User avatar
InvincibleCakeEater
GRB's obsessive compulsive baseball poster
Posts: 28259
Joined: October 12 07, 12:28 pm
Location: Raptured

Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread

Post by InvincibleCakeEater »

cardslesson101 wrote:
InvincibleCakeEater wrote:TO to the Bengals. 1 year 2 million plus 2 million in incentives.
They wasted money on Bryant then.
PUP

User avatar
Lesson
Grandmaster Flashchat
Posts: 6623
Joined: February 4 10, 4:35 pm

Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread

Post by Lesson »

InvincibleCakeEater wrote:
cardslesson101 wrote:
InvincibleCakeEater wrote:TO to the Bengals. 1 year 2 million plus 2 million in incentives.
They wasted money on Bryant then.
PUP

Still, they look like idiots when you spend $28 Million on a WR, then sign another WR. It's his knee that brought up these concerns, correct?

User avatar
Lesson
Grandmaster Flashchat
Posts: 6623
Joined: February 4 10, 4:35 pm

Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread

Post by Lesson »

The St. Louis Rams reached an agreement with No. 1 overall pick Sam Bradford on a six-year, $78 million deal, sources told ESPN on Friday night.

According to the sources, Bradford's deal contains $50 million of guarantees and has a max value of $86 million.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5425041

User avatar
InvincibleCakeEater
GRB's obsessive compulsive baseball poster
Posts: 28259
Joined: October 12 07, 12:28 pm
Location: Raptured

Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread

Post by InvincibleCakeEater »

Bradford's deal has been finished. 50 million guaranteed. 6 years 78 million. Incentives up to 86 million.

User avatar
stlouie_lipp
Hallelujah Brother
Posts: 13380
Joined: April 17 06, 7:36 pm

Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread

Post by stlouie_lipp »

$50 million guaranteed without throwing a single pass in the NFL.

Wow....just, wow.

User avatar
st.lewis11
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 15679
Joined: June 14 06, 10:17 pm
Location: Small southern IL town, 40 min from STL

Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread

Post by st.lewis11 »

stlouie_lipp wrote:$50 million guaranteed without throwing a single pass in the NFL.

Wow....just, wow.
Yeah, no kidding.

User avatar
Secret Weapon
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 8386
Joined: May 12 06, 7:09 pm
Location: CoMo

Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread

Post by Secret Weapon »

they need to have a rookie cap in the next CBA

User avatar
stlouie_lipp
Hallelujah Brother
Posts: 13380
Joined: April 17 06, 7:36 pm

Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread

Post by stlouie_lipp »

Secret Weapon wrote:they need to have a rookie cap in the next CBA
I think this contract will help get that done. Florio at profootballtalk.com had this comment"
No matter what the details say, it just became a little harder to sign Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, and Drew Brees.

And it became a little easier to dial back rookie deals in 2011 once and for all.

User avatar
cpebbles
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 8829
Joined: August 30 07, 12:28 pm

Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread

Post by cpebbles »

If first round picks aren't worth what you are paying them, here's a crazy idea: Stop paying them so much.

Salary caps = "Save us from ourselves." If these contracts are really so bad, just don't sign your first round pick and on average you're better off than the people who did.

Post Reply