Re: 2011 St. Louis Rams Season Thread
Posted: January 17 12, 10:02 am
My roommate is a Jets fan. He offered me his condolences after hearing the news. I am assuming that's a bad thing.
A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
https://gatewayredbirds.org/forum/
Why? Did we get Sanchez as well?JackofDiamonds wrote:My roommate is a Jets fan. He offered me his condolences after hearing the news. I am assuming that's a bad thing.
I think Bradford has shown better decision making than Sanchez as well. It's not entirely Bradford's fault that the bulk of his smart passes end up being dropped.cpebbles wrote:Bradford is a more accurate passer than Sanchez, but would the Jets' offense have really taken off with the QB completing 60% of his passes instead of 55%?
It may have more to do with Int's.TheoSqua wrote:I think Bradford has shown better decision making than Sanchez as well. It's not entirely Bradford's fault that the bulk of his smart passes end up being dropped.cpebbles wrote:Bradford is a more accurate passer than Sanchez, but would the Jets' offense have really taken off with the QB completing 60% of his passes instead of 55%?
The easy way to make that decision is this: Who'd you rather have, Bradford or Sanchez? I bet if Rex Ryan could trade for Bradford straight up for Sanchez right now he'd do it without blinking.vinsanity wrote:It may have more to do with Int's.TheoSqua wrote:I think Bradford has shown better decision making than Sanchez as well. It's not entirely Bradford's fault that the bulk of his smart passes end up being dropped.cpebbles wrote:Bradford is a more accurate passer than Sanchez, but would the Jets' offense have really taken off with the QB completing 60% of his passes instead of 55%?
Bradford career Int% is 2.2 and Sanchez is 3.6%. That's per attempt so it seems odd and the TD:INT ration is similar-ish (24:21 Bradford, 55:51 Sanchez), but Sanchez has had a better O-Line and better D so he's had to pass less. ~30 Att/game for Sanchez and 36.5 att/game for Bradford. Keller, Holmes, Plaxico, Edwards and Cotchery seems like a better list of WR's than what Bradford's had most of his career here.
Then play with leads as opposed to from behind makes a difference in defensive play calling. I don't know much about the OC, but I'd argue Bradford's been a bit smarter with the ball than Sanchez over the last two years and arguably a better passer.
Ya, the shades of gray get tough.cpebbles wrote:Bradford is better than Sanchez, but I'm not sold on him being all that much better. There certainly isn't much evidence that he's so much better that you could have plugged Bradford into the Jets' offense and had a powerhouse unit.