Page 46 of 123

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Posted: December 8 11, 3:48 pm
by Socnorb11
ilstu24 wrote:
docellis wrote:created flexibility for org, to redeploy those resources

I heard him say that, but I'll believe it when I see it.

There's really no reason to think that they won't spend what they've been spending.

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Posted: December 8 11, 3:48 pm
by docellis
current players have contacted mo with words of support re; the org

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Posted: December 8 11, 3:49 pm
by Lesson
Anyone have an update on what the Cardinals current payroll is for 2012?

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Posted: December 8 11, 3:49 pm
by ilstu24
Prefers FA over trades.

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Posted: December 8 11, 3:49 pm
by docellis
Asked if he'd "like to be a mystery team in future negotiations," Mozeliak: "Not really."

mitigated a lot of risk by AP saying no.

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Posted: December 8 11, 3:50 pm
by TimeForGuinness
Lesson wrote:Anyone have an update on what the Cardinals current payroll is for 2012?
About $22 million less than yesterday.

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Posted: December 8 11, 3:50 pm
by Donnie Ebert
Slider wrote:
MrCrowesGarden wrote:Mo says the legacy Albert could've had a la Musial is now gone.
Found that interesting as well...he said he can't be in those talks of Musial, Ripken, Gwynn...he really looked like that bothered him as well when he said that.
He seemed perturbed that they didn't include Musial in their list.

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Posted: December 8 11, 3:50 pm
by BW23
But they shouldn't spend just to spend. Their hands are pretty tied, though. Middle infield/CF is the obvious places to upgrade. And really, unless you're getting a star CF, then a 1-year stopgap might help with Craig being hurt. I'd guess they envision Adams as the 2013 possible 1B.

Lohse and Westbrook are likely going nowhere, so the rotation won't see a bump. We can all hope they'll sign a SP, but unless one of them are traded, it won't happen.

The pen is pretty well set other than a couple of arms. There's no reason to spend much money there.

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Posted: December 8 11, 3:51 pm
by Slider
Donnie Ebert wrote:
Slider wrote:
MrCrowesGarden wrote:Mo says the legacy Albert could've had a la Musial is now gone.
Found that interesting as well...he said he can't be in those talks of Musial, Ripken, Gwynn...he really looked like that bothered him as well when he said that.
He seemed perturbed that they didn't include Musial in their list.

Musial was the last one in the list...they said Ripken Gwynn, short pause and musial

Re: Pujols Signs With Angels

Posted: December 8 11, 3:52 pm
by Michael
Thanks for the updates everyone!