AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:Jeremy roenick...Lol. really wanted goalie interference or to at least know why it was not interference. Idk the rules but seems like if the goalie is 100 percent outside the crease they don't get protected, no?
The problem with the rule is there is too much grey area. If the goalie is out of the net incidental contact is allowed, but what the hell does that mean? The problem with the rule is it is called so inconsistently. By the way it has been called all year I thought that should've been goaltender interference, but I'm not going to put up much of a fight for a team that has had the benefit more times than not from close calls in the playoffs.
Re: 2016-2017 Blues (Hockey) Season
Posted: April 18 17, 4:58 pm
by JCShutout
Goalie interference leading to a Hawks loss in the playoffs? I didn't see the game. Do I have the right video here?
Re: 2016-2017 Blues (Hockey) Season
Posted: April 18 17, 5:19 pm
by tlombard
I see nothing wrong with that play myself.
Re: 2016-2017 Blues (Hockey) Season
Posted: April 18 17, 5:24 pm
by JCShutout
Me neither.
Re: 2016-2017 Blues (Hockey) Season
Posted: April 18 17, 5:25 pm
by MrCrowesGarden
Re: 2016-2017 Blues (Hockey) Season
Posted: April 19 17, 8:21 pm
by JCShutout
WTF was that Allen?
Re: 2016-2017 Blues (Hockey) Season
Posted: April 19 17, 8:22 pm
by lukethedrifter
That was a bad goal. Can't make it that easy.
Re: 2016-2017 Blues (Hockey) Season
Posted: April 19 17, 8:27 pm
by JCShutout
Damn, hit the post on the pp and the period ends 1-0 Wild. That was a dumpster fire of a period. That period was only slightly better than the Cardinals defense and slightly worse than the Cards offense.
