JL21 wrote:That guy sounds like an enormous jackass. It all comes off as "You peasants outside of NYC can have the Super Bowl. We don't need it."
So basically every New Yorker ever, about anything that isn't exclusively theirs.
I dunno, I kind of like the idea that there's a place that won't lie down and spread its legs for the NFL. Let's be honest here--the NYC metropolitan area has more to offer than places like Indianapolis or Jacksonville.
JL21 wrote:That guy sounds like an enormous jackass. It all comes off as "You peasants outside of NYC can have the Super Bowl. We don't need it."
So basically every New Yorker ever, about anything that isn't exclusively theirs.
I dunno, I kind of like the idea that there's a place that won't lie down and spread its legs for the NFL. Let's be honest here--the NYC metropolitan area has more to offer than places like Indianapolis or Jacksonville.
Then why lobby for it in the first place? Let another place that might actually appreciate the economic bump have it instead of taking the money and still pretending like it's some annoying inconvenience. I don't really see that as something to admire.
I think letting an area host a super bowl is NFL way of patting on the head, for spending a billion on new stadium and supporting infrastructure/services.
JL21 wrote:That guy sounds like an enormous jackass. It all comes off as "You peasants outside of NYC can have the Super Bowl. We don't need it."
So basically every New Yorker ever, about anything that isn't exclusively theirs.
I dunno, I kind of like the idea that there's a place that won't lie down and spread its legs for the NFL. Let's be honest here--the NYC metropolitan area has more to offer than places like Indianapolis or Jacksonville.
Then why lobby for it in the first place? Let another place that might actually appreciate the economic bump have it instead of taking the money and still pretending like it's some annoying inconvenience. I don't really see that as something to admire.
+++++
Indianapolis was consumed by Super Bowl week. It was electric. That's how it should be for the biggest event that sports has to offer.
Why are we (or 99.8% of us) supposed to care if NY isn't fully embracing the SB experience, or if the weather misbehaves? Just because the pool of reporters, dignitaries and NFL fan elites feel slighted....the rest of us will still be eating chili, drinking beer.
If you want the Super Bowl to be electric, one of the participating teams should host it.
Meanwhile, not sure why it's to NYC's discredit that it isn't wigging out over the NFL hype machine. Because that's what we're talking about here, all of the loud, obnoxious hype, not the game. Speaks well of New York that it isn't going gaga over all that ridiculous nonsense that Leitch describes. What should they do, lay down rose petals for Roger Goodell to walk on? Are we supposed to admire Indianapolis for obsessing over the Super Bowl because there's nothing else to do there?
Freed Roger wrote:Why are we (or 99.8% of us) supposed to care if NY isn't fully embracing the SB experience, or if the weather misbehaves? Just because the pool of reporters, dignitaries and NFL fan elites feel slighted....
Suck it up Bernie, etc.
Yeah, Bernie. A sports writer is getting a paid vacation to cover a game between two teams that don't come from his city. Should be thanking his lucky stars.
Freed Roger wrote:Why are we (or 99.8% of us) supposed to care if NY isn't fully embracing the SB experience, or if the weather misbehaves? Just because the pool of reporters, dignitaries and NFL fan elites feel slighted....
Suck it up Bernie, etc.
Yeah, Bernie. A sports writer is getting a paid vacation to cover a game between two teams that don't come from his city. Should be thanking his lucky stars.