Rk Tm Year G W L W-L%cpebbles wrote:It's almost statistically impossible for them not to have been stealing signs at home all year. Their home/road splits are beyond ridiculous.
1 CIN 1975 81 64 17 .790
2 PIT 1902 71 56 15 .789
3 BRO 1953 78 60 17 .779
4 STL 1942 78 60 17 .779
5 CHC 1910 77 58 19 .753
6 SFG 1962 82 61 21 .744
7 PHI 1977 81 60 21 .741
8 CHC 1907 76 54 19 .740
9 STL 1943 81 58 21 .734
10 CIN 1919 70 51 19 .729
11 BRO 1955 77 56 21 .727
12 CHC 1906 79 56 21 .727
13 PIT 1909 79 56 21 .727
14 CHC 1935 77 56 21 .727
15 CIN 1940 77 55 21 .724
16 BRO 1942 79 57 22 .722
17 NYG 1905 76 54 21 .720
18 BRO 1946 79 56 22 .718
19 PIT 1977 81 58 23 .716
20 CIN 1962 81 58 23 .716
21 STL 1944 77 54 22 .711
22 CHC 1933 79 56 23 .709
23 SFG 2003 81 57 24 .704
24 CIN 1970 81 57 24 .704
25 NYG 1913 81 54 23 .701
26 NYM 1988 80 56 24 .700
Those are the teams who have played .700 ball at home over an entire season, the Brewers are at 40-14 (.741) right now. We can only afford to lose 4 more home game or we will fall behind the infamous, sign stealing, 1942 Cardinals pace.
Um what, any evidence for this?They aren't getting any real benefit from having a runner at second (Where sign-stealing is an accepted part of the game and most teams get a big boost).
How do you explain all the pitchers doing well at home, are they stealing the 'take sign' and 'hit away' sign from the dugout?McGehee is pretty much the only player on the team not beating projections.
You really embarrass yourself and lose all future credibility when talking about statistics.Besides, worst-case scenario...

