Cecil

The forum for ranting, raving, complaining and praising
Post Reply
User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30785
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Re: Cecil

Post by ghostrunner »

"On the Pequod, we don't cry for whales" by Captain Ahab.

AWvsCBsteeeerike3
"I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
Posts: 27559
Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Location: Thinking of the Children

Re: Cecil

Post by AWvsCBsteeeerike3 »

The situation kind of reminds me of this.



Yeah, it's tough to get behind a lion killer, but it's almost equally tough to understand the outrage.

tlombard
tl;dr
Posts: 5042
Joined: May 21 09, 12:41 pm

Re: Cecil

Post by tlombard »

They really thought that the whaling industry had given up? What morons.

My lord those Sea Shepherd people are obnoxious. While I have no desire to kill whales or think people should, those people make me just as angry.

How about you spend some of that freaking money trying to feed some starving children or housing homeless.

User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 31004
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: Cecil

Post by Popeye_Card »

tlombard wrote:They really thought that the whaling industry had given up? What morons.

My lord those Sea Shepherd people are obnoxious. While I have no desire to kill whales or think people should, those people make me just as angry.

How about you spend some of that freaking money trying to feed some starving children or housing homeless.
While I am generally pro-human, I guess there is the argument that there's like 6 billion of us on the planet, vs. only a few thousand of some species. If we were evaluating us as an animal population, we'd realize that humans are an apex predator whose population needs to be thinned out for a healthy ecosystem.

I realize that entire statement makes me sound heartless.

tlombard
tl;dr
Posts: 5042
Joined: May 21 09, 12:41 pm

Re: Cecil

Post by tlombard »

I definitely agree with you. All the medical advances humans have accomplished are great but at the same time, they are allowing us to over populate and basically destroy the planet. And of course there is the other downside of keeping just plain stupid people alive so they can procreate and cause more problems. If you impale your junk trying to jump a jet ski from a lake to a pool, doctors should not fix you up so you can have more children.

Those people just annoy me with their self righteous holier than thou attitude and I can't help myself from saying stuff like that.

User avatar
The Third Man
It rubs the lotion on its skin.
Posts: 8935
Joined: July 17 06, 1:00 pm

Re: Cecil

Post by The Third Man »

tlombard wrote:They really thought that the whaling industry had given up? What morons.

My lord those Sea Shepherd people are obnoxious. While I have no desire to kill whales or think people should, those people make me just as angry.

How about you spend some of that freaking money trying to feed some starving children or housing homeless.
I like to call this the "there are kids starving in Africa" fallacy.

AWvsCBsteeeerike3
"I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
Posts: 27559
Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Location: Thinking of the Children

Re: Cecil

Post by AWvsCBsteeeerike3 »

The Third Man wrote:
tlombard wrote:They really thought that the whaling industry had given up? What morons.

My lord those Sea Shepherd people are obnoxious. While I have no desire to kill whales or think people should, those people make me just as angry.

How about you spend some of that freaking money trying to feed some starving children or housing homeless.
I like to call this the "there are kids starving in Africa" fallacy.
? There aren't kids starving in Africa?

User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30785
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Re: Cecil

Post by ghostrunner »

AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:
The Third Man wrote:
tlombard wrote:They really thought that the whaling industry had given up? What morons.

My lord those Sea Shepherd people are obnoxious. While I have no desire to kill whales or think people should, those people make me just as angry.

How about you spend some of that freaking money trying to feed some starving children or housing homeless.
I like to call this the "there are kids starving in Africa" fallacy.
? There aren't kids starving in Africa?
It's a logical fallacy. Saying you can't do or worry about X because Y is still a problem.

AWvsCBsteeeerike3
"I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
Posts: 27559
Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Location: Thinking of the Children

Re: Cecil

Post by AWvsCBsteeeerike3 »

ghostrunner wrote:
AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:
The Third Man wrote:
tlombard wrote:They really thought that the whaling industry had given up? What morons.

My lord those Sea Shepherd people are obnoxious. While I have no desire to kill whales or think people should, those people make me just as angry.

How about you spend some of that freaking money trying to feed some starving children or housing homeless.
I like to call this the "there are kids starving in Africa" fallacy.
? There aren't kids starving in Africa?
It's a logical fallacy. Saying you can't do or worry about X because Y is still a problem.
Well, sure, but in this case you can pretty easily say the tens of millions of dollars and hundreds of thousands if not millions of man hours they spent saving a couple hundred whales would probably have been better spent feeding those children, no?

User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30785
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Re: Cecil

Post by ghostrunner »

AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:
ghostrunner wrote:
AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:
The Third Man wrote:
tlombard wrote:They really thought that the whaling industry had given up? What morons.

My lord those Sea Shepherd people are obnoxious. While I have no desire to kill whales or think people should, those people make me just as angry.

How about you spend some of that freaking money trying to feed some starving children or housing homeless.
I like to call this the "there are kids starving in Africa" fallacy.
? There aren't kids starving in Africa?
It's a logical fallacy. Saying you can't do or worry about X because Y is still a problem.
Well, sure, but in this case you can pretty easily say the tens of millions of dollars and hundreds of thousands if not millions of man hours they spent saving a couple hundred whales would probably have been better spent feeding those children, no?
I don't know a thing about this group, but just for the sake of argument how many wildlife organizations would you like to shut down in order to feed all the starving children? It's also not as if money is the only barrier to feeding hungry people.

My two cents is it's possible to work on both, and there are other obstacles to address if you want to feed hungry people.

Post Reply