Page 9 of 102
Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread
Posted: August 22 10, 10:35 am
by lukethedrifter
Personally I love the FOUR PILLARS!
I sure hope they didn't just spend 80 million dollars on a terrible quarterback.
Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread
Posted: August 22 10, 1:39 pm
by Centreville
Bradford and the playcalling were awful last night. Shurmur is to Spags what Marmie was to Martz.
Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread
Posted: August 22 10, 2:56 pm
by Blitzer
Centreville wrote:Bradford and the playcalling were awful last night. Shurmur is to Spags what Marmie was to Martz.
Dude. Its preseason. PREseason. Relax.
Bradford's second game, pouring rain, a lot of dropped balls by receivers.
Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread
Posted: August 22 10, 3:16 pm
by InvincibleCakeEater
redbirdjazzz wrote:
About damn time somebody picked up Danario.
That's going to be a ridiculously good signing. Completely unbiased, I thought he was one of the top 2-3 WR in the draft. Not great at anything, but pretty good at everything. Physical, gets open, doesn't drop the ball. Was hoping the Chiefs would snag him.
Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread
Posted: August 22 10, 3:31 pm
by Lesson
InvincibleCakeEater wrote:redbirdjazzz wrote:
About damn time somebody picked up Danario.
That's going to be a ridiculously good signing. Completely unbiased, I thought he was one of the top 2-3 WR in the draft. Not great at anything, but pretty good at everything. Physical, gets open, doesn't drop the ball. Was hoping the Chiefs would snag him.
Turns out, he hasn't been signed...
Up early, got a flight to #STL for a workout Monday, then we'll go from there. Thanks for all of the support
http://twitter.com/d_alexander81
If he passes the physical, it's likely that he'll be signed.
Anyways, if his knee can hold up, this will be a great signing for the Rams.
Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread
Posted: August 22 10, 3:33 pm
by Lesson
Centreville wrote:Bradford and the playcalling were awful last night. Shurmur is to Spags what Marmie was to Martz.
Bradford's a rookie and the fact that it was raining and there tons of dropped balls by the WRs didn't effect what you just said at all?
Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread
Posted: August 22 10, 3:46 pm
by Blitzer
cardslesson101 wrote:Centreville wrote:Bradford and the playcalling were awful last night. Shurmur is to Spags what Marmie was to Martz.
Bradford's a rookie and the fact that it was raining and there tons of dropped balls by the WRs didn't effect what you just said at all?
It was probably those darn kids that got to his computer again.
Anyway, with what was said about it being hard to get into the Rams, I totally agree. I consider myself a Rams fan. Ive followed them since they came to STL in 95. But This is a team that is hard to follow. Im hoping that Laurinaitis rejuvenates this D and Bradford can do the same to the offense. I was impressed by what I saw from Gilyard last night too. It will be awhile before the Rams are "good" but I think that they will be in a good place in a few years
Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread
Posted: August 22 10, 6:19 pm
by MrCrowesGarden
Multiple sources saying the Alexander signing is official now.
Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread
Posted: August 22 10, 6:23 pm
by Lesson
MrCrowesGarden wrote:Multiple sources saying the Alexander signing is official now.
Yep, it's on the Rams website. They dropped 2009 Draft Pick, Brooks Foster, for him.
Re: St. Louis Rams 2010 Season Thread
Posted: August 22 10, 6:46 pm
by Centreville
Yet another wasted draft pick..what else is new ?