Re: Trade Rumors - Cards looking at Oswalt?
Posted: July 29 10, 4:17 pm
And even if Wallace becomes Lyle Overbay at the MLB level, that's probably still more valuable than a Michael Bourne clone.
A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
https://gatewayredbirds.com/forum/
I'm not really sure. After factoring in positional scarcity and defense, I think Bourne is definitely more valuable. My main concern is that Wallace is probably a good bet to become Overbay, while Gose is a long shot to become Bourne.Fat Strat wrote:And even if Wallace becomes Lyle Overbay at the MLB level, that's probably still more valuable than a Michael Bourne clone.
Kyle wrote:Are you being serious or just kidding?Magneto2.0 wrote:Miller + Luddy and Motte for Wade Davis and Zobrist??
Wade Davis is like a fast-forwarded version of Shelby Miller that doesn't flame out in the minors. He's, in a lot of ways, a best-case Shelby Miller scenario.
Over the last three seasons ('08-'10), Ludwick has a 126 OPS+; in that same span, Zobrist has a 123 OPS+. Ludwick is under team-control through 2011 (he'll probably make $8 million next year). Zobrist is under team control through 2014, and won't make $8 million once in that entire span. Zobrist is also a very versatile player -- he can play short, second, and left and right fields.
Motte wouldn't tip the scales at all. Pulling off a trade like that would be a Mulder-for-Haren-Calero-and-Barton-caliber fleecing.
Kyle wrote:I'm not really sure. After factoring in positional scarcity and defense, I think Bourne is definitely more valuable. My main concern is that Wallace is probably a good bet to become Overbay, while Gose is a long shot to become Bourne.Fat Strat wrote:And even if Wallace becomes Lyle Overbay at the MLB level, that's probably still more valuable than a Michael Bourne clone.
I'm not really interested in debating about who's more valuable between Overbay and Bourn, so I'll just quote this and say that its the most important part; regardless of what you project them to become, Wallace is a much safer bet to reach that plateau. And so on that we definitely agree.Fat Strat wrote:Add in the higher likelihood that Wallace becomes Overbay and the fact that Gose has a lot of work to do to become Bourne, it's not even remotely an even trade.
I understand that he's having a bad year. I just don't understand how his stock can fall this far seemingly over night.greenback44 wrote:Wallace's 2010 MLE from minorleaguesplits.com is 239/289/384. He turns 24 in August and he's a not-so-good defensive 1b. He's roughly as valuable as the current version of Miguel Tejada.
His stock wasn't that high a year ago when he was traded, along with two halfway-decent prospects, for two months of Holliday.Kyle wrote:I understand that he's having a bad year. I just don't understand how his stock can fall this far seemingly over night.greenback44 wrote:Wallace's 2010 MLE from minorleaguesplits.com is 239/289/384. He turns 24 in August and he's a not-so-good defensive 1b. He's roughly as valuable as the current version of Miguel Tejada.