Page 90 of 140
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: January 24 18, 1:48 pm
by Hoot45
Cubs know the Cardinals need a lot to go right in order to seriously challenge them even without making a big move this offseason. So they can wait to assemble Bryant/Rizzo/Harper. Meanwhile New York can put together Judge/Stanton/Machado so MLB can have a decade of its own version of the NBA's Warriors and Cavs.
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: January 24 18, 2:10 pm
by Jocephus
Even with Darvish, I wouldn't say the Brewers are a better team than the Cardinals.
'
by jortiz edited by Mike Smith 1:17 PM
If the Brewers sign Darvish are they second best team in the NL Central. And if the Brewers trade for Yelich, are they still the second best team but the Cards are a distant third.
How much do the NL Central Power rankings change with Darvish added to Cubs/Brewers.
by Mark S edited by Mike Smith 1:16 PM
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: January 24 18, 2:23 pm
by Tim
I'm following this chat and Ortiz seems like a simpleton.
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: January 24 18, 2:25 pm
by Tim
If this is the only disappointing thing you have to deal with, you're living a charmed life.
by jortiz 3:24 PM
ReplyPermalink
It's still discouraging that after all of their comments about financial flexibility that their payroll will most likely be lower than last year.
I mean wtf kind of answer is this?
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: January 24 18, 2:28 pm
by Jocephus
yeah, total non-answer. why did he even publish it?
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: January 24 18, 2:32 pm
by Tim
I'm giving it to him about Nicasio and Reed. I'm zitroj
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: January 24 18, 2:32 pm
by Tim
In Planet St. Louis.
by jortiz 3:31 PM
ReplyPermalink
On what planet is Gergerson worth a two year contract and Nicassio and Reed aren't?
Is he even trying?
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: January 24 18, 2:44 pm
by sighyoung
Tim wrote:In Planet St. Louis.
by jortiz 3:31 PM
ReplyPermalink
On what planet is Gergerson worth a two year contract and Nicassio and Reed aren't?
Is he even trying?
Yes, if you mean performing a golden shower.
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: January 24 18, 4:31 pm
by Transmogrified Tiger
Jocephus wrote:
Even with Darvish, I wouldn't say the Brewers are a better team than the Cardinals.
'
by jortiz edited by Mike Smith 1:17 PM
If the Brewers sign Darvish are they second best team in the NL Central. And if the Brewers trade for Yelich, are they still the second best team but the Cards are a distant third.
How much do the NL Central Power rankings change with Darvish added to Cubs/Brewers.
by Mark S edited by Mike Smith 1:16 PM
The Brewers ZiPS projections are worse than the Reds. If there was a way to short public perception of the Brewers I'd take out a second mortgage to take advantage.
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: January 25 18, 3:19 pm
by davhern
Jocephus wrote:
Even with Darvish, I wouldn't say the Brewers are a better team than the Cardinals.
'
by jortiz edited by Mike Smith 1:17 PM
If the Brewers sign Darvish are they second best team in the NL Central. And if the Brewers trade for Yelich, are they still the second best team but the Cards are a distant third.
How much do the NL Central Power rankings change with Darvish added to Cubs/Brewers.
by Mark S edited by Mike Smith 1:16 PM
Cubs fan here (for the sake of full disclosure)...the Cardinals would absolutely still be better than Milwaukee even if Milwaukee somehow got Darvish.