Luddy was probably going to cost too much for them in 2011. Still, a weird deal.Kyle wrote:This is the way I look at it:Socnorb11 wrote:I think the deal sucks, but I didn't want Westbrook to begin with (I know some of you did).
But I do think that some of you are overvaluing Ludwick.
We traded Ludwick for a non-prospect and Jake Westbrook. Ludwick is better than Westbrook, and also has an extra year of team control.
I guess you can argue that we traded from our "surplus" of outfielders to fill a need in the rotation, but from a pure value standpoint, we definitely lost this trade.
P.6 Ludwick to SD; Westbrook and Pads prospect to STL
- JL21
- NPR & THT Contributor
- Posts: 36109
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
- Location: Chocolate City
Re: P.6 Ludwick to SD; Westbrook and Pads prospect to STL
- Secret Weapon
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 8386
- Joined: May 12 06, 7:09 pm
- Location: CoMo
Re: P.6 Ludwick to SD; Westbrook and Pads prospect to STL
so the Pads give up 2 crap prospects and get Ludwick
the Indians give up Westbrook for a crap prospect
and we give up Ludwick for Westbrook and a crap prospect
again i ask, why didnt we just trade a crap prospect for Westbrook?
or Ludwick for more than just Westbrook?
blah
the Indians give up Westbrook for a crap prospect
and we give up Ludwick for Westbrook and a crap prospect
again i ask, why didnt we just trade a crap prospect for Westbrook?
or Ludwick for more than just Westbrook?
blah
- st.lewis11
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 15679
- Joined: June 14 06, 10:17 pm
- Location: Small southern IL town, 40 min from STL
Re: P.6 Ludwick to SD; Westbrook and Pads prospect to STL
Completely agree. we could've only given up a Kluber-like prospect for Westbrrok.Kyle wrote:This is the way I look at it:Socnorb11 wrote:I think the deal sucks, but I didn't want Westbrook to begin with (I know some of you did).
But I do think that some of you are overvaluing Ludwick.
We traded Ludwick for a non-prospect and Jake Westbrook. Ludwick is better than Westbrook, and also has an extra year of team control.
I guess you can argue that we traded from our "surplus" of outfielders to fill a need in the rotation, but from a pure value standpoint, we definitely lost this trade.
-
greenback44
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 11663
- Joined: June 26 06, 8:54 pm
- Location: In a Small Town with Jack and Diane
Re: P.6 Ludwick to SD; Westbrook and Pads prospect to STL
Compare that to the other pitcher deals out there.G. Keenan wrote:So we just traded Ryan Ludwick for Jake Westbrook. Ouch.
La Russa has been wanting to deal Ludwick since 2008. He finally got his way.
-
Magneto2.0
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 18018
- Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm
Re: P.6 Ludwick to SD; Westbrook and Pads prospect to STL
LOL'10 Cardinals may be the canonical example of Sheehan's Trade Deadline Axiom: no matter what teams need, they all think they need pitching.
Mo needs to get a M.I. so I wont cry..
- InvincibleCakeEater
- GRB's obsessive compulsive baseball poster
- Posts: 28259
- Joined: October 12 07, 12:28 pm
- Location: Raptured
Re: P.6 Ludwick to SD; Westbrook and Pads prospect to STL
You guys worry too much. Jon Jay's .446 BABIP is completely sustainable.
- go birds
- -go birds
- Posts: 32053
- Joined: February 5 10, 9:54 am
Re: P.6 Ludwick to SD; Westbrook and Pads prospect to STL
TERRIBLE TERRIBLE TERRIBLE
- Bo Hart
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 8770
- Joined: April 14 06, 9:50 pm
Re: P.6 Ludwick to SD; Westbrook and Pads prospect to STL
Maybe he was, but there's still value to that control for another team then, right? This was the best we can do? I hate to sound Cards Talk-ish here, but this is pathetic.JL21 wrote:Luddy was probably going to cost too much for them in 2011. Still, a weird deal.
- Fan_In_NY
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 5372
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:22 pm
- Location: Birthplace of Baseball- Hoboken, NJ
Re: P.6 Ludwick to SD; Westbrook and Pads prospect to STL
Well i guess the one benefit is that there is more money that can go to Albert's salary. And getting an mid level OF free agent in the offseason tends to come cheap in terms of $$. All I know is that Colby is on notice...he needs to be a solid #5 hitter now.
- sighyoung
- Mayor of GRB
- Posts: 38552
- Joined: April 17 06, 7:42 pm
- Location: Louisville
Re: P.6 Ludwick to SD; Westbrook and Pads prospect to STL
There has to be a Nicholas Greenwood-Montana Fishburne porn tape being thrown in on this deal.






