Spinks vs Taylor Fight
- Blitzer
- All-Star
- Posts: 1847
- Joined: May 4 06, 1:16 am
- Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
- Contact:
Spinks vs Taylor Fight
Tonight around 9 on HBO. Anyone got plans to watch it?
Blitzer
Blitzer
- Blitzer
- All-Star
- Posts: 1847
- Joined: May 4 06, 1:16 am
- Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
- Contact:
Online
- G. Keenan
- Sucking on the Rally Nipple
- Posts: 23718
- Joined: April 16 06, 6:03 pm
- Location: Chicago
I completely agree. Spinks definintely fought his fight. I don't blame him for not attacking Taylor, who had a big size advantage. It was pretty much a bad, matchup, imo, that was bound to not produce much action.StLBlitzerMM515 wrote:I agree. But thats how Spinks fights. I dunno. I didnt think Taylor won as big as everyone says he did. Spinks made Taylor play his game. I definitely think Taylor won, but I felt Spinks did what he meant to do.G. Keenan wrote:That might have been the lamest fight I've ever seen.
Blitzer
Online
- G. Keenan
- Sucking on the Rally Nipple
- Posts: 23718
- Joined: April 16 06, 6:03 pm
- Location: Chicago
As I understood it Taylor's camp had offered that fight to many people before Spinks. If I'm Spinks and someone offers me a bunch of money to fight a guy I know I don't match up well against I'd do the exact same thing. No way does Taylor actually way only 160 lbs and no way can Spinks out-punch him. I thought he had pretty good strategy all things considered: counter-punch against a slower fighter and hope to steal the title.Socnorb11 wrote:I just watched it.
REALLY bad fight. I feel sorry for the folks that paid good money for tickets.
I was hoping Spinks would win, but it's hard to respect a guy like him that refuses to fight, and just runs all night.......
-
Socnorb11
- The Last Word
- Posts: 21906
- Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am
I don't necessarily disagree that it was a solid strategy to keep from getting knocked out, but there was no way he was going to win the fight like that, so what's the point?G. Keenan wrote:As I understood it Taylor's camp had offered that fight to many people before Spinks. If I'm Spinks and someone offers me a bunch of money to fight a guy I know I don't match up well against I'd do the exact same thing. No way does Taylor actually way only 160 lbs and no way can Spinks out-punch him. I thought he had pretty good strategy all things considered: counter-punch against a slower fighter and hope to steal the title.Socnorb11 wrote:I just watched it.
REALLY bad fight. I feel sorry for the folks that paid good money for tickets.
I was hoping Spinks would win, but it's hard to respect a guy like him that refuses to fight, and just runs all night.......
Spinks will have a hard time getting another lucrative payday, simply because boxing fans likely won't pay to watch him fight again.
Online
- G. Keenan
- Sucking on the Rally Nipple
- Posts: 23718
- Joined: April 16 06, 6:03 pm
- Location: Chicago
You're right. That one judge did give it to Spinks 117-111, which prompted Lampley to say that he should never be allowed to judge again. That cracked me up.Socnorb11 wrote:I don't necessarily disagree that it was a solid strategy to keep from getting knocked out, but there was no way he was going to win the fight like that, so what's the point?G. Keenan wrote:As I understood it Taylor's camp had offered that fight to many people before Spinks. If I'm Spinks and someone offers me a bunch of money to fight a guy I know I don't match up well against I'd do the exact same thing. No way does Taylor actually way only 160 lbs and no way can Spinks out-punch him. I thought he had pretty good strategy all things considered: counter-punch against a slower fighter and hope to steal the title.Socnorb11 wrote:I just watched it.
REALLY bad fight. I feel sorry for the folks that paid good money for tickets.
I was hoping Spinks would win, but it's hard to respect a guy like him that refuses to fight, and just runs all night.......
Spinks will have a hard time getting another lucrative payday, simply because boxing fans likely won't pay to watch him fight again.