NHL Realignment

A forum for non-baseball sports
User avatar
JackofDiamonds
Bringer of Boston Baked Blue Balls
Posts: 15010
Joined: April 16 06, 9:15 pm

NHL Realignment

Post by JackofDiamonds »

Finally official, the NHL is realigning starting next season. The new format goes back to divisional playoffs, with 4 geographically distinct divisions, the top 3 of each make up the first 12 teams in the playoffs. The final two playoff spots per conference are wild card format, with the next two teams, regardless of division, making the playoffs. First two rounds are division playoffs, then conference, then Championships.

Looks like this (sorry Florida):

Image

User avatar
thrill
bronoun enthusiast
Posts: 30537
Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
Location: barely online

Re: NHL Realignment

Post by thrill »

Looks like room for a possible team in Seattle along with the new arena for the Sonics.

User avatar
letsgocards89
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 3654
Joined: April 17 06, 7:35 pm
Location: Too close for missiles, switching to guns

Re: NHL Realignment

Post by letsgocards89 »

I wonder if the Florida teams are in the NE conference because of plans for relocation

User avatar
JackofDiamonds
Bringer of Boston Baked Blue Balls
Posts: 15010
Joined: April 16 06, 9:15 pm

Re: NHL Realignment

Post by JackofDiamonds »

trill wrote:Looks like room for a possible team in Seattle along with the new arena for the Sonics.
No doubt, though if Toronto gets a second team (there's a strong lobby for it right now), it's going to screw up the weights again.

The new alignment is up for review in 2 years... so expect 2 new teams then.

User avatar
thrill
bronoun enthusiast
Posts: 30537
Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
Location: barely online

Re: NHL Realignment

Post by thrill »

They can have the Coyotes.

I wonder what kind of presence the Canucks have in the Sea-Tac area. Wonder if it would cannibalize that fan base at all.

User avatar
JackofDiamonds
Bringer of Boston Baked Blue Balls
Posts: 15010
Joined: April 16 06, 9:15 pm

Re: NHL Realignment

Post by JackofDiamonds »

trill wrote:They can have the Coyotes.

I wonder what kind of presence the Canucks have in the Sea-Tac area. Wonder if it would cannibalize that fan base at all.
Can't move the Kye-otes outside of the West because the west is already 2 teams lighter than then East. Also, 7% harder to make the playoffs in the East than in the West. EAST COAST BIAS.

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37260
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: NHL Realignment

Post by lukethedrifter »

I thought they were contracting.

User avatar
st.lewis11
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 15746
Joined: June 14 06, 10:17 pm
Location: Small southern IL town, 40 min from STL

Re: NHL Realignment

Post by st.lewis11 »

I don't feel sorry for the Florida teams at all, they still stay in the time zone, & the distance geographically to their Canadian foes are closer than what some teams in other divisions are with theirs.
Examples: Edmonton vs. Phoenix, Dallas vs. Winnipeg, etc.

User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 30993
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: NHL Realignment

Post by Popeye_Card »

Kinda sucks for Popeye_Card, as it means fewer games against Detroit and C'bus (the closest to him). But he likes that division.

User avatar
mikechamp
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 11652
Joined: April 17 06, 5:05 pm
Location: Southwestern Illinois

Re: NHL Realignment

Post by mikechamp »

lukethedrifter wrote:I thought they were contracting.
I would think this would be more likely than expansion. The NHL doesn't need more teams for Bettman to screw with.

Post Reply